Isis: Why the US can't send in ground troops to defeat the militant group

A ground war is what Isis wants because it plays into the group's apocalyptic rhetoric

Monday 07 December 2015 15:10 GMT

(Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

On 6 December, four days after a shooting in San Bernardino, California, left 14 dead and 21 injured, President Barack Obama used a major Oval Office speech to talk about threats facing the US.

One of the shooters was suspected of pledging her allegiance to the terrorist group Isis on Facebook as the attack was unfolding.

Obama addressed the ongoing threat from Isis and attempted to explain the US' current strategy to counteract the group's influence in the Middle East and across the world, including deploying special operations forces to Iraq and Syria, bombing Isis targets, boosting intelligence-sharing with allies, supporting Iraqi and Syrian forces on the ground, and pursuing a political settlement to end the Syrian civil war.

One thing Obama was adamant about, however, was that US not commit to a "long and costly ground war in Iraq or Syria." His reasoning: That's what Isis wants.

Shortly after the speech, New York Times foreign correspondent Rukmini Callimachi tweet-stormed a response that further elucidated Obama's point: a ground war is what Isis wants because it plays into the group's apocalyptic rhetoric.

Here's Callimachi's explanation of the situation in Syria and Iraq:

Rukmini Callimachi on Isis

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Thank you for registering