Iraq 'made 22 attacks' on US and British aircraft
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.British and American aircraft were attacked by Iraqi missiles and multiple-rocket launchers more than 22 times during January, it was claimed today.
British and American aircraft were attacked by Iraqi missiles and multiple-rocket launchers more than 22 times during January, it was claimed today.
The figure was higher than for the whole of last year. Downing Street said it was a sign of Iraq stepping up its offensive activity since the New Year, possibly linked to Baghdad's acquisition of a new fibre-optic aircraft-detection system.
It was this system which was attacked in Friday's air strikes near Baghdad.
The strikes led to a torrent of international condemnation, headed by the Arab League, Russia, China and France.
The fibre-optic system is believed to increase the range at which allow Iraqi anti-aircraft units can spot Allied planes compared with conventional radar.
Meanwhile, it emerged that appeals from MPs for the recall of Parliament from its week-long recess to discuss the strikes have been turned down.
Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon wrote to MPs including Tony Benn to tell them that a recall was unnecessary, as the strikes - blamed by Baghdad for the death of two civilians - were not an escalation of violence or a change in policy.
Downing Street and the Ministry of Defence today stuck to their insistence that the attacks were necessary to defend the safety of Allied aircrew patrolling no-fly zones in the north and south of Iraq.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments