Iranian Jew 'has confessed to spying'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Court Officials claimed yesterday that one of the main defendants in the trial of 13 Iranian Jews accused of spying for Israel had confessed.
Hossein Ali Amiri, the head of the judiciary in Shiraz, southern Iran, where the trial is being held behind closed doors, said Hamid "Danny" Teflin confessed to spying for Israel in court and that his case was "finished".
Earlier, in the first foreign contact with the case, which is being closely watched by Western governments, a representative of the New York-based organisation, Human Rights Watch, was admitted to the court to speak to the judge and see one of the defendants. Prosecutors were laying out in detail the state's case against the Jewish defendants for the first time yesterday. The evidence is believed to rest mainly on confessions.
Charges were to be read out against three others: Shahrokh Paknahad, who taught Hebrew and religious lessons; Faramarz Kashi, a fellow teacher; and Ramin Nematizadeh, a merchant.
Esmail Nasseri, the lawyer for the defence, said the confessions were "irrelevant" and that the acts committed by his clients failed to meet the legal definition of spying under Iranian law, because the information they gathered was not classified. The trial continues.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments