Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
If Carlos Ghosn thought he would be safe in Lebanon, he may have been very wrong.
A group of lawyers on Thursday lodged a complaint with Lebanon's judiciary, saying visits he made to Israel in his position as chair of Renault and later Nissan constitute a crime under laws forbidding citizens from interacting with Lebanon's arch foe, which has been in a state of war with Lebanon for the past 60 years.
That could put him in a tougher position than any charges of embezzlement or financial wrongdoing, which are the norm among elites in Lebanon's deeply corrupt society. Collaborating with the enemy is regarded as a serious offence, potentially more serious than the charges the former Nissan executive was facing when he slipped out of Japan earlier this week and showed up in Beirut, expecting a warm welcome.
If found guilty, the Brazilian-born Mr Ghosn who also holds Lebanese and French passports, could face a prison sentence of up to 15 years in Lebanon, according to judicial officials.
The prevailing narrative, that Mr Ghosn is a hero in Lebanon, a native son who set out into the world and made his fortune, may take a dent.
“If he thinks that he actually could be protected here, it's not going to happen because according to Lebanese law he visited Israel, which is an enemy state,” said Mohammed Obeid, a Lebanese political analyst.
“First he's corrupted and second he's a traitor. So how can he be a Lebanese hero?” he asked. “Maybe he is popular with some of his friends, but to most Lebanese he is a collaborator.”
Mr Ghosn's new Lebanon headache came as the international community scrambled to unravel the mystery of how he managed to skip bail in Japan, where his passports were supposedly held under lock and key by his lawyers and Japanese authorities.
Turkish police detained seven people on Thursday, including four pilots, on suspicion of having helped Mr Ghosn escape Japan and transit through Istanbul on his way to Lebanon. An investigation has been launched into Mr Ghosn's “illegal arrival” in Turkey after he escaped house arrest in Japan, according to the Anadolu news agency.
The four pilots were believed to have travelled on the private jet that brought Mr Ghosn from Japan on his way to Beirut. Two employees of a private ground handling company and the operations manager of a private cargo company were also detained.
Lebanon's Justice Ministry said on Thursday that it has received a wanted notice for Mr Ghosn issued by Interpol, the international police organisation. But while Interpol “red notices” alert police about internationally wanted fugitives, there is no compulsion for any country to detain the subject.
A senior Lebanese security official said Lebanon did not intend to act on the notice, because Mr Ghosn is not wanted for any crimes in Lebanon. “Once he is legally in the country, we don't have the authority to arrest him,” the official said.
“He did not kill anyone or commit an international crime. Still, we have to watch developments as things are becoming more complicated,” he added.
Mr Ghosn has said he is not a fugitive from justice but was escaping injustice and political persecution.
Independent legal experts contrast the harsh treatment that Mr Ghosn received in Japan - a total of more than 120 days' detention in an unheated cell and hours of interrogation without a lawyer present on charges that carried a maximum sentence of 15 years - with the way Japanese business executives often get away with a slap on the wrist for much more serious crimes.
Nevertheless, major questions remain unanswered about Mr Ghosn's tenure as head of Nissan and Renault, two car companies whose fortunes he turned around and merged into a powerful alliance. Mr Ghosn was charged with four counts of financial misconduct and aggravated breach of trust, including by allegedly under-reporting his income and enriching himself through payments to dealerships in the Middle East.
Whether things get really complicated for Mr Ghosn in Lebanon could be subject to Lebanon's labyrinthine politics. The country is teetering from a wave of popular protests demanding substantial reforms to a system that typically divides powerful positions into sects. Separately, a financial crisis is pushing the country towards total economic collapse.
Mr Ghosn has powerful allies, including the country's foreign minister, Gebran Bassil, and his father-in-law, Lebanese president Michel Aoun. They are among the leaders battling for influence over positions in the next government with other Lebanese factions, including the powerful Hezbollah movement.
There is a risk, said Sami Nader, who heads the Lebanese Institute for Strategic Affairs, that Mr Ghosn could become a political football in the wider Lebanese power struggle, a bargaining chip to be tossed into the negotiations for a new government. “The issue is already internationalised,” he said. “The question now is whether it will also become Lebanonised.”
The lawyers who filed the suit said they had no political motives other than to assert their sense of justice. Ali Abbas, one of the lawyers involved, said he supports the popular revolution against Lebanon's government. It is an outrage, he said, that Mr Ghosn should be welcomed back to Lebanon when he had dealings with Israel, a country whose wars against Lebanon have killed Lebanese civilians.
“Tolerating normalisation with the Zionist entity (meaning Israel) is not acceptable and the attempt to show Carlos Ghosn as a national hero and a redeemer of the economic crisis in spite of his dealings with Israel is something that we civil society activists will not accept,” said the case filed with the office of the public prosecutor.
Mr Ghosn does not deny that he has visited Israel, friends said. Photographs on social media show him meeting with Israel's then-president Shimon Peres and prime minister Ehud Olmert during a 2008 visit to seal a deal between Renault and Israel to produce electric cars.
“He is an international CEO with three passports, and he visited Israel on a business trip representing the companies he heads,” said Ricardo Karam, a friend who is a TV personality in Lebanon.
The photographs are more than 10 years old, and under Lebanon's statute of limitations, those visits can't be prosecuted. The lawyers allege that Mr Ghosn visited more recently, and that it is now up to the Lebanese judiciary to investigate whether that is true, said prosecutor Ghassan Oweidat.
He said he expected to announce the result of the investigation on 9 January, and if charges are brought, he would then be ordered to appear before a military tribunal.
The law on visiting Israel has been unevenly applied in the past, with some citizens serving lengthy sentences and others being let off. The Oscar-nominated director Ziad Doueiri was detained in 2017 and taken before a military tribunal for filming part of one of his movies in Israel; he was released later.
It may not come to that, said Mr Nader. “He can play on the divisions in Lebanese society and among Lebanese officials,” he said. “In the Lebanese system you can always find a way.”
But, he added, “his journey is not over yet.”
The Washington Post
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments