Brunei claims new laws punishing gay sex with death by stoning are ‘preventative’
Foreign minister claims criminalising ‘adultery and sodomy’ will ‘safeguard the sanctity of family lineage’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Brunei has said a new law introduced which includes punishing gay sex with stoning is intended to focus “more on prevention than punishment”.
Brunei’s foreign minister, Erywan Yusof, has claimed the punishments contained in the country’s newly-introduced Shariah Penal Code are designed “to educate, deter, rehabilitate and nurture rather than to punish”.
Brunei sparked global outrage by rolling out a harsh range of capital punishments, which also include death by stoning for adultery and amputation for theft.
Responding to the United Nations which called the measures “cruel and inhuman”, Mr Yusof reportedly defended the implementation of the Shariah Penal Code and tried to justify the punishments, which amount to torture.
In his letter to the UN, Mr Yusof said the move to criminalise “adultery and sodomy” would “safeguard the sanctity of family lineage and marriage of individual Muslims, particularly women”.
Amnesty International’s deputy director of global issues Stephen Cockburn said: “To legalise torture is sickening and callous in any circumstance. To do so as a preventive measure is also reckless.
“Likewise, to defend the threat of amputation and stoning as aiming to ‘rehabilitate and nurture’ is plainly absurd. Merely enacting such laws creates a toxic and threatening environment.
“The Brunei authorities must refrain from implementing them, must take necessary steps to repeal this unacceptable legislation, and bring it in line with international human rights laws and standards.”
Foreign secretary Jeremy Hunt said on Thursday he had spoken to the Bruneian foreign minister who suggested Sharia prosecutions were, in practice, “unlikely”.
Brunei has signed but not yet ratified the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, and has rejected all recommendations to this effect in its human rights review at the UN in 2014, Amnesty International said.
Under international human rights law, corporal punishment in all its forms – such as stoning, amputation or whipping – constitutes torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment, which is prohibited in all circumstances.
Brunei’s Shariah Penal Code does not replace civil law but is expected to operate alongside it. It is understood each case requires an initial decision to determine whether it should be prosecuted under civil or Shariah law.
Under the new laws, offences including rape, adultery, sodomy, robbery and insult or defamation of the Prophet Muhammad carry the maximum penalty of death.
Lesbian sex is punishable by 40 strokes of a cane and/or a maximum of 10 years in jail. For theft, the maximum punishment is amputation.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments