Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Kohl's tax reforming strategy for growth is sunk

Imre Karacs Bonn
Tuesday 29 July 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The "Great Tax Reform" that was to reinvigorate Germany and propel Helmut Kohl to a fifth term as Chancellor was sunk yesterday, submerged in inter-party conflict which marks an end to five decades of consensus politics.

Though tax giveaways would have amounted in the end to only DM30bn (about pounds 10bn), much more was at stake. By improving the stifling climate for business, the German government had tried to reverse the country's relative decline, and it failed.

Yesterday, it became clear that there could be no compro-mise between the government-controlled Bundestag and the opposition-dominated second chamber, the Bundesrat. Next week, MPs will be summoned from their holiday villas in Tuscany for an emergency session of Parliament. Their task will be to cobble together a finance Bill so that civil servants can be paid, but several planks of the reform will have to be jettisoned.

With the highest labour costs in the world and monumental unemployment, Chancellor Kohl's government was trying to reduce the burden borne by German industry. The opposition Social Democrats, tipped according to the polls to form the government after next year's elections, refused to oblige.

The SPD's leader, Oskar Lafontaine, had held several rounds of talks with Chancellor Kohl to hammer out a deal, but all attempts at compromise foundered. The SPD's last offer was a watered-down package giving away DM15bn. The party would not accept a reform "a la Kohl and Waigel," declared the Social Democrats' chief negotiator, Peter Struck.

"I have the impression that the SPD has learnt only one thing from Lafontaine - what the former Soviets used to practise at the United Nations - namely to say `nyet'," said Theo Waigel, the Finance Minister.

It was a classic Waigelian riposte, packaging as it did allusions to the Social Democrats' alleged Stalinism, with a dig at their obstructionism; a heinous crime in the consensus-seeking ethos of German politics. But to pin all blame on the main party of opposition for the failure of a government that has been in power for 15 years smacks of desperation. Perhaps Mr Lafontaine never wanted a deal, but it might also be true that the government was in no position to cut one.

The "Great Tax Reform" that emerged from the coalition coffee rooms at the beginning of this year was already a rather miserable little mouse. Billed to "make Germany fit for the 21st century", the plans were denounced by business as "a scandal" and the minutiae of VAT percentages nearly blew Mr Kohl's government apart.

That may still happen. The Chancellor's junior coalition partners, the Free Democrats, are holding Mr Kohl's future to ransom to a small cut in the "solidarity surcharge" levied to pay for rebuilding the East. Without the opposition's help, Mr Kohl may not be able to oblige.

If he does, he might have trouble fulfilling another important strategic goal: meeting the deficit requirements laid down in the Maastricht Treaty. In short, Europe's longest-serving leader is in a mess.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in