King Charles III is invoked to scare Australian voters
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE AUSTRALIAN Republican Movement yesterday attempted to sway undecided voters by declaring that a "no" vote in tomorrow's referendum would mean Australia's next head of state would be King Charles III.
Polls continue to suggest the likely defeat of the referendum proposing that Australia become a republic. But the expected outcome will be anything but a vote of confidence in the monarchy, according to analysis yesterday of an opinion poll which found that only a tiny proportion of people wanted to retain the Queen as head of state.
The analysis of a Newspoll survey that had "no" voters leading "yes" voters by 54 to 42 per cent, was published in a Sydney newspaper, the Daily Telegraph. According to the detailed breakdown, only 9 per cent of people who oppose a republic do so on the grounds that they support the monarchy. By far the biggest reason cited by those planning to veto the referendum was general satisfaction with the status quo.
A relatively small proportion, 16 per cent, said they would vote "no" because they wanted a republic with a president directly elected by the people, rather than one appointed by two-thirds of parliament, as is currently envisaged. Thirty-three per cent said there was too much uncertainty about the model of republic offered.
Malcolm Turnbull, the chairman of the Australian Republican Movement, said yesterday monarchists had refused to defend the monarchy. "The 'no' case has avoided the Queen," he said during a debate at the National Press Club in Canberra. "[Yet] they want to keep the Queen in our constitution. This is the love that dare not speak its name, if ever there was one."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments