Israel blames Syria over border deaths: Damascus warned to halt its 'planned escalation' of attacks in south Lebanon
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ISRAEL yesterday accused Syria of deliberately stirring up attacks against its forces in south Lebanon, carried out by pro-Iranian and pro-Palestinian militias, warning that its 'response' to the conflict across its northern border was undergoing a major review and could escalate.
It is no coincidence that the renewed violence in south Lebanon, which has left five Israeli soldiers dead and eight wounded in the past four days, comes as progress in the Middle East peace talks has stalled, and as a US envoy is in the region trying to patch things up. Dennis Ross, US co-ordinator for the talks, arrived in Damascus yesterday for discussions with Hafez al-Assad, the Syrian President, carrying a message from Yitzhak Rabin, the Israeli Prime Minister, warning Mr Assad not to fuel the south Lebanon conflict.
Uri Lubrani, Israel's chief negotiator with Lebanon, said the attacks were a 'planned escalation'. He added: 'This would not happen if Syria did not want it. I am sure this escalation requires different treatment than others until now.'
Syria exercises a large degree of control over militias in south Lebanon, which aim, without any success, to force back the Israeli army and its proxy forces of the South Lebanon Army (SLA), which occupy a narrow strip just north of the Israeli-Lebanese border in what Israel terms its 'security zone'. Israel keeps its forces in south Lebanon as a protective shield for its northern settlements.
Syria has shown in the past that it can fan attacks in the region, when it suits its purpose to play its 'south Lebanon card', to put pressure on Israel for concessions in the talks.
The first of the two recent lethal attacks on Israeli forces was carried out by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, General Command (PFLP-GC,) led by Ahmed Jibril, which is based in Damascus. Israeli helicopters hit back by rocketing a PFLP-GC base south of Beirut. The second attack was carried out by pro-Iranian Hizbollah gunmen, whose arms supplies are protected by Syria.
Israeli warnings of 'new action' in south Lebanon are often repeated, but options are severely limited. A full-scale invasion would destroy the peace process. Commando-style attacks - such as the killing of the Hizbollah leader Sheikh Abbas Moussawi last year - have achieved nothing. Recently, therefore, verbal threats have been the order of the day.
However, concern about the growing severity of the south Lebanon conflict is real in Jerusalem. Israeli analysts say the number of 'terrorist' attacks, and their sophistication, is rising. Whatever Syria's current purposes, Israel's real fear is Iranian involvement. There is new evidence that Hizbollah and the Palestinian factions are co-ordinating their activities under an Iranian-Syrian umbrella, say the analysts. And the gunmen's casualties, as a proportion of Israeli casualties, is now less than 2:1, compared with more than 5:1 in 1990.
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments