Yeltsin puts EU foreign policy to the test : EURO FILE
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Russia is shaping up as a test case for EU foreign policy. The decision not to apply pressure on Moscow over Chechnya taken at the EU foreign ministers' meeting on Monday was a victory for France, Britain and Germany and a defeat for the European Commission, which wanted tougher measures. But policy towards Moscow from Brussels is haphazard and sketchy at the moment.
Russia will be the main focus of a weekend meeting which ministers plan in March in Carcassonne. Britain and France, among other states, want a carefully considered, long-term policy put in place. They are also to consider the deeper questions of how theEU should use the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) introduced by the Maastricht treaty.
How the EU turns economic influence into political weight - and, indeed, whether that is the goal - will be the subject of a heated discussion this year. Britain wants EU foreign policy to be "more effective", with more considered, better prepared discussions. That means more staff to service the Council of ministers, the meetings of government ministers. France has similar ideas. There are also likely to be proposals to lengthen the period during which countries hold the chairman's role in the EU, now set at six months, and to change the rotation so that there is always a big country on hand.
These proposals are likely to get fleshed out later this year. But they amount to little more than tinkering with the machinery. Other countries - and the European Commission - want more involvement for the supranational institutions (the Commission and the European Parliament). They are highly critical of CFSP, which they believe only functions at the lowest common denominator. They also want a reduction in national vetoes.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments