Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ukraine says Russian APCs destroyed after crossing the border

 

An armed pro-Russian separatist by a shelled gas pipeline in Donetsk yesterday
An armed pro-Russian separatist by a shelled gas pipeline in Donetsk yesterday (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Nato and Ukraine have said that Russian military vehicles did cross into Ukraine on Thursday night, while the Ukrainian President stated that most of them had been destroyed by his troops.

A statement on President Petro Poroshenko’s website said that he and David Cameron spoke by telephone about the reports in The Guardian and The Telegraph that Russian armoured personnel carriers (APCs) were seen crossing into Ukraine near the point where a Russian aid convoy was parked.

“The President informed [him] that the given information was trustworthy and confirmed because the majority of the machines had been eliminated by Ukrainian artillery at night,” the statement said.

Mr Poroshenko did not include any proof for this, and the Russians denied that the incursion had taken place.

Nato’s Secretary-General, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, said the Alliance had observed a Russian “incursion” into Ukraine. “What we have seen [Thursday] night is the continuation of what we have seen for some time,” he said during a visit to Copenhagen.

Russia’s ambassador to the UK, Alexander Yakovenko, was summoned to the Foreign Office to clarify the reports.

Earlier yesterday, Russia let Ukrainian officials inspect an aid convoy while it was still on Russian soil and agreed that the Red Cross can distribute the goods in Ukraine’s rebel-held city of Luhansk. The twin moves aimed to dispel Ukrainian fears that the operation was a ruse to get military help to the pro-Russian separatists.

Breaking an earlier deal, Russia had sent the convoy of roughly 200 aid trucks towards a border crossing under the control of pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine, raising the prospect that it could enter without being inspected by Ukraine or the Red Cross.

Ukraine vowed to use all means necessary to block the convoy in such a scenario, leading to fears of an escalation in the fighting that has ravaged eastern Ukraine since April.

As tensions were raised, dozens of Russian military APCs were yesterday seen moving around the area where the trucks were parked, about 17 miles from the border in a Russian feild.

Moscow said that Russian forces were patrolling the border, but denied that any military vehicles had crossed into Ukraine.

The fighting in eastern Ukraine has claimed nearly 2,100 lives, half of those in the past few weeks. It began in April, a month after Vladimir Putin annexed Ukraine’s Black Sea peninsula of Crimea.

EU foreign ministers said in a statement after talks in Brussels yesterday that the European Union was “increasingly concerned at the worsening crisis in eastern Ukraine and its humanitarian impact on the civilian population.

“Any unilateral military actions on the part of the Russian Federation in Ukraine under any pretext, including humanitarian, will be considered by the EU as a blatant violation of international law,” it said. AP

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in