Trump appears to be planning for a historic Putin summit
Trump’s hawkish adviser John Bolton is expected to arrive in Moscow as early as next week
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.As ties to traditional allies fray, US President Donald Trump seems to be gearing up for a major summit with Vladimir Putin.
On Thursday, the Kremlin said it was “aware” of a forthcoming Moscow visit by the White House’s national security adviser, John Bolton. According to the Interfax news agency, that visit could come as early as next week, with Mr Trump following soon thereafter.
Two dates are said to be under consideration: either before the Nato summit beginning on 11 July in Brussels, or after the president’s UK visit two days later. One of the more likely locations is Vienna, the headquarters of the OSCE, of which both Russia and the US are members.
Earlier this week, the Kremlin insisted there were “no plans” for a meeting before the Nato summit. But the prospect of a reversal has apparently worried European leaders.
The Times quoted a “senior Western diplomatic source” as saying an early Trump-Putin meeting, before the Nato summit, would “cause dismay and alarm” in Europe. A Whitehall source talked of “fear” for the future of Nato.
Presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov said he had “no comment” on the Times article. It was “unlikely to represent the views of the British people,” he added.
The choice of Mr Trump’s national security adviser for the Moscow visit has raised eyebrows. Mr Bolton is known for hawkish views on Russia and has criticised the White House for failing to extract a price from Vladimir Putin for alleged interference in US elections. The secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, would have been a more obvious choice.
But the choice was likely to be practical, said the former Kremlin adviser and security expert Vladimir Frolov. It was not a “Nixon to China” moment, he said, referring to the right-wing US president’s unexpected 1972 visit to communist China.
“Pompeo is busy with North Korea,” he said. “Besides, Bolton is not [Nixon’s secretary of state] Kissinger – he is coming to execute Trump’s irresistible urge to meet with Putin.”
Relations between Moscow and Washington have been strained since Mr Trump took office. They have been characterised by sanctions, tit-for-tat diplomatic expulsions, trade tensions and growing mistrust.
But while official ties have diminished, the relations between the leaders have remained warm. The Russian leadership has pointedly refrained from criticism of the US president, blaming instead the “wrecking activities” of Congress. President Trump has on his part refrained from serious criticism of Russia.
In recent weeks, the US president even argued for Russia’s reinstatement into the G7 group of leading economic nations. Russia was expelled from the then-G8 in 2014 following the annexation of Crimea. Mr Trump’s comments went pointedly against the official position of G7 partners.
It is not clear how much his move represented US policy, or was an improvised snub to European leaders ahead of trade negotiations. That will become clear as soon as Mr Bolton opens his briefcase in Moscow, said Mr Frolov.
“Bolton’s aim, most likely, will be to agree on a flowery statement with the sole practical agreement to launch substantive talks and unfreeze channels of communications,” he said.
“But even that will be interpreted as a big win for Putin.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments