Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Switzerland waters down immigration referendum to protect EU relationship

The Swiss narrowly voted in favour of quotas limiting number of migrants from within EU in February 2014

Samuel Osborne,Matt Broomfield
Thursday 15 December 2016 12:51 GMT
Comments
An anti-immigration poster created by Switzerland's largest political party, reading "create safety"
An anti-immigration poster created by Switzerland's largest political party, reading "create safety" (Ralph Orlowski)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Switzerland has watered down its 2014 immigration referendum in order to protect its relationship with the European Union.

The Swiss parliament has agreed on new rules which differ from the legally binding referendum after it decided it did not want to sacrifice its EU relationship.

In February 2014, the Swiss people narrowly voted in favour of quotas to limit the number of migrants from within the EU.

Switzerland is not a member of the EU but has a free movement agreement, meaning EU citizens can live and work there
Switzerland is not a member of the EU but has a free movement agreement, meaning EU citizens can live and work there (Getty Images)

If implemented fully, the proposal was likely to tear up agreements with the EU on free movement of people, which could have jeopardised Swiss access to the single market.

However, the new rules on unemployment contain no mention of quotas on immigration and instead seek to limit the impact of foreign workers on the job market.

Employers will be obliged to advertise vacant positions to job centres and invite Swiss job seekers for interview — or risk a 40,000 franc fine, The Local reports.

In addition, Europeans who lose their job within the first year will have six months to leave the country.

But the obligations only apply to professions or regions where unemployment is above average, and employers will not be forced to justify their reasons for refusing a Swiss candidate.

While Switzerland is not a member of the EU, it is the bloc's third largest trading partner after the USA and China and has a free movement agreement meaning EU citizens can live and work there.

The law is still subject to a final vote, scheduled to be held on Friday, but this is likely to be only a formality.

The vote comes as the parliament debates legislation on whether foreigners must prove they are integrated into Swiss society to secure a residency permit.

Immigrants would have to demonstrate they respect security, public order and constitutional values "such as equality between men and women", according to Swiss newspaper Le Matin, even if they have lived and worked in the country for more than 15 years

The proposed legislation would also demand foreigners speak a Swiss national language and participate in education or "economic life".

Currently, foreigners arriving in Switzerland with employment contracts in place are typically granted a one to five year B visa. When that expires after five years of work, they can normally secure a permanent C visa.

But they will now have to wait a decade and demonstrate their willingness to integrate.

The measures are similar to those proposed by the British government in the Integration Review carried out by Dame Louise Casey.

All foreigners arriving in the UK should be required to take a compulsory "oath of integration with British values", Dame Casey suggested, in a review condemned by campaigners as "adding to the politics of racism and scapegoating."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in