Somme selfies: have you got a light?
In the run-up to July’s centenary of one of the bloodiest battles in human history, The Independent is publishing a different Tommy’s picture every day
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Two British soldiers in “Gor Blimey” soft caps share a cigarette in the months before the battle of the Somme, which started 100 years ago this week. The lack of foliage in the background suggests that this image was taken in early 1916 when the British army was starting preparations in northern France for its “Big Push” on the Somme. Neither the cap or shoulder badges of these soldiers can be read with certainty. In the battle, which lasted until 18 November, 125,000 British and empire soldiers died – many of them from the “pals” or “chums” battalions who volunteered in 1914. This photograph is part of a series of images that were taken in late 1915 and in 1916 for a few francs by a local photographer behind the front line, Alfred Depire, for British soldiers to send home as postcards to their loved ones.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments