Nuclear weapons should be used in response to 'non-nuclear strategic weapons', says Russian parliamentary committee
Calls for more precise wording for when the weapons should be used
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Russian parliamentary committee has said that nuclear weapons should be used in response to “hypersonic and non-nuclear strategic weapons”.
Russia’s upper house of parliament has provided a non-binding recommendation to the National Security Council to change its rules on nuclear weapons.
The rulebook is updated once every few years and was last changed in 2014.
The current doctrine has provisions for nuclear responses if there is a “risk to statehood” but the latest recommendation calls for more precise wording.
Recommended changes to the requirements include references to hypersonic weapons which are not currently in use.
Russia and China are the two countries believed to be aggressively pursuing research in this field.
Hypersonic weapons travel at least five times faster than the speed of sound and are currently in development.
Currently there are no effective defence systems against hypersonic weapons, which when they are functional will be able to fly at altitudes of up to 100,000 feet.
Agencies contributed to this report
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments