Russia nearly shot down a British spy plane, leaked documents suggest
Incident described as ‘really, really scary’ by a US defence official briefed on the encounter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Russian fighter jet had fired a missile at a manned British aircraft over the Black Sea last September in what could have amounted to an act of war, leaked classified intelligence has suggested.
The near shoot-down was due to miscommunication between the pilot and ground radar operator, according to a report from The New York Times published on Wednesday.
The pilot had locked on to the British aircraft and fired, but the munition malfunctioned and failed to fire properly, according to US defence officials and a recently leaked classified intelligence report cited by NYT.
The US defence officials told the publication that the Russian pilot misinterpreted what a radar operator on the ground was saying to him and thought he had permission to fire.
The near shoot-down took place between a four-engine aircraft known as an RC-135 Rivet Joint – a spy plane – and two Russian Su-27 fighter jets, said two US defence officials with direct knowledge of the incident.
The British C-135 Rivet Joint aircraft often has a crew of around 30 people and is capable of intercepting radio traffic.
According to the US officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, the British aircraft was listening to intercepted communications between a Russian radar controller on the ground when one of the pilots of the Russian Su-27s was dispatched to monitor the aircraft.
The incident was described as “really, really scary” by one of the defence officials briefed on the encounter.
In October, British defence secretary Ben Wallace had told the Commons that the Russian fighter jet had “released a missile” in the vicinity of an RAF aircraft over the Black Sea.
He had not described the incident as a near shoot down.
He had said the incident occurred in “international airspace over the Black Sea” on 29 September and added that an “unarmed RAF RC-135 Rivet Joint” was “interacted with by two Russian armed SU-27 fighter aircraft”, one of which “released a missile in the vicinity of the RAF Rivet Joint beyond visual range”.
Mr Wallace informed the Commons that he had communicated with the Russian defence minister Sergei Shoigu and the reply he received stated that the incident was “a technical malfunction of the Su-27 fighter”.
A British defence official, however, told NYT that “a significant proportion” of the contents of the reports were “untrue” and “manipulated”.
“A significant proportion of the content of these reports is untrue, manipulated, or both. We strongly caution against anybody taking the veracity of these claims at face value and would also advise them to take time to question the source and purpose of such leaks,” the statement said.
The leaked documents also said that between 1 October and 22 February, British, French and American flights reacted to six different events in which Russian aircraft approached their patrols from distances of six nautical miles to just 100ft.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments