Russia and Nato hail decision as victory for peace
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Nato countries and Russia yesterday reacted with relief to President Bill Clinton's decision to defer a decision on proceeding with the controversial US missile defence shield.
Nato countries and Russia yesterday reacted with relief to President Bill Clinton's decision to defer a decision on proceeding with the controversial US missile defence shield.
Russia, which along with China had been hostile to the project from the outset, hailed Mr Clinton's "constructive approach" to the issue.
"There is a hope that a balanced approach towards solving the world's key problems, primarily those concerning global security, will prevail," said General Leonid Ivashov, head of the Russian defence ministry's international cooperation department.
Russia was opposed to the proposal on the grounds that it would violate the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty, a cornerstone of modern arms control.
The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation also welcomed the "prudent" decision to delay development of the shield until the next US administration.
The move "appears to be a prudent course of action that balances the many factors involved in this issue," George Robertson, the NATO secretary-general, said. Several NATO states in Europe, notably France and Germany, had expressed the hope that the project would be delayed following problems during recent tests.
Robin Cook, the Foreign Secretary, said: "We welcome the measured approach [of] President Clinton ... which has taken careful account of the views of the United States' allies."
Mr Cook and the Defence Secretary, Geoff Hoon, fearedBritain could become a target for "rogue states" if it went ahead. There has also been concern at the potential cost of buying into future missile defence systems, as well as the possible threat to strategic stability.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments