Romania’s top court annuls first round of presidential election amid fears of Russian interference
Ruling follows declassification of intelligence alleging Russia ran online campaign to promote far-right outsider who finished top
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Romania's top court has annulled the first round of the country's presidential election, days after allegations that Russia ran a coordinated online campaign to promote the far-right outsider who finished in pole position.
The Constitutional Court's unprecedented decision – which is final – came after president Klaus Iohannis declassified intelligence on Wednesday that alleges Russia ran a sprawling campaign comprising thousands of social media accounts to promote Calin Georgescu across platforms like TikTok and Telegram.
The intelligence files were from the Romanian Intelligence Service, the Foreign Intelligence Service, the Special Telecommunication Service and the Ministry of Internal Affairs.
The first round was won by Calin Georgescu, who previously praised Vladimir Putin, who is sceptical of Nato and wants to end Romania's support for its neighbour Ukraine. He was polling in the single digits in October but surged to a surprise victory with just under 23 per cent of the first-round votes.
A date will now be set to rerun the first round. Mr Georgescu was due to face the reformist Elena Lasconi of the Save Romania Union party in a run-off on Sunday. Ms Lasconi condemned the court's decision, saying it was "illegal, immoral, and crushes the very essence of democracy".
"We should have moved forward with the vote. We should have respected the will of the Romanian people. Whether we like it or not, from a legal and legitimate standpoint, nine million Romanian citizens, both in the country and the diaspora, expressed their preference for a particular candidate through their votes. We cannot ignore their will!" she said.
"I know I would have won. And I will win because the Romanian people know I will fight for them, that I will unite them for a better Romania. I will defend our democracy. I will not give up."
She said the problem of Russian interference should have been tackled after the election was completed.
Prime minister Marcel Ciolacu said in a statement the annulment was "the only correct solution" following the intelligence drop which revealed the "Romanian people's vote was flagrantly distorted as a result of Russian interference".
"The presidential elections must be held again," he said in a post on Facebook. "At the same time, investigations by the authorities must uncover who is responsible for the massive attempt to influence the outcome of the presidential election."
The same court last week ordered a recount of the first-round votes, which added to the myriad controversies that have engulfed a chaotic election cycle.
Cristian Andrei, a political consultant based in Bucharest, said the court's decision amounts to a "crisis-mode situation for the Romanian democracy".
"In light of the information about the external interference, the massive interference in elections, I think this was not normal but predictable, because it's not normal times at all, Romania is in uncharted territory," he told The Associated Press. "The problem is here, do we have the institutions to manage such an interference in the future?"
Thirteen candidates ran in the first round of the presidential vote in the EU and Nato member nation. The president serves a five-year term and has significant decision-making powers in areas such as national security, foreign policy and judicial appointments.
Mr Georgescu's surprising success left many political observers wondering how most local surveys were so far off – they put him behind at least five other candidates before the vote.
Many observers attributed his success to his TikTok account, which has 5.8 million likes and 531,000 followers. But some experts suspect Mr Georgescu's online following was artificially inflated, while Romania's top security body alleged he was given preferential treatment by TikTok over other candidates.
In the intelligence release, the secret service alleged that one TikTok user paid more than €361,000 (£300,000) to other users to promote Mr Georgescu’s content. Intelligence authorities said information they obtained "revealed an aggressive promotion campaign" to increase and accelerate his popularity.
Asked whether he believes the Chinese-owned TikTok poses a threat to democracy, Mr Georgescu said: "The most important existing function for promoting free speech and freedom of expression is social media."
AP
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments