Rivals both claim win over Yukos decision
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Russia violated the rights of the now-defunct oil behemoth Yukos, the European Court of Human Rights ruled yesterday. But the court rejected a contention that the prosecution of Yukos was politically motivated and deferred any ruling on nearly $100bn (£63bn) in damages.
The authorities were unfair in meting out punishment to the company over tax violations and didn't give Yukos enough time to prepare its defence, according to the ruling from the court in Strasbourg. The ruling is open for a months-long appeal process available to both sides.
Yukos sought $98bn in damages, the largest claim in the court's 50-year history and one of Russia's biggest legal challenges to date. The company – a major Russian taxpayer whose primary subsidiary once produced as much oil as all of Libya – was dismantled by Russian authorities after the 2003 arrest of its founder and owner, Mikhail Khodorkovsky. His supporters say then-President Vladimir Putin's Kremlin mounted an orchestrated effort to destroy a tycoon seen as a threat to Mr Putin's rule.
The European court found the question of damages "is not ready for decision" and gave both parties three months to reach a settlement. If they don't, the court will rule later on whether to order any damages.
The court's nine-judge panel found that Russia violated three articles of the European Convention on Human Rights, including the right to a fair trial. The court also found the enforcement proceedings were disproportionate. The court, however, denied an allegation that Russia misused legal procedures to dismantle Yukos.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments