Risk of nuclear terror attack now "far more likely"
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A nuclear attack by terrorists is "far more likely" now than it was before the September 11 outrage, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency warned today.
It would most probably come in the form of radioactive contamination, or the targeting of nuclear facilities to cause a Chernobyl–style disaster, said IAEA director general Mohamed ElBaradei.
Although the chances of terrorists having the resources and technical ability to build a nuclear bomb were remote, the possibility could not be ruled out, he said.
The IAEA, the UN nuclear watchdog agency based in Vienna, carries out verification inspections and sets world safety and security standards.
Mr ElBaradei said: "The willingness of terrorists to sacrifice their lives to achieve their evil aims creates a new dimension in the fight against terrorism.
"We are not just dealing with the possibility of governments diverting nuclear materials into clandestine weapons programmes. Now we have been alerted to the potential of terrorists targeting nuclear facilities or using radioactive sources to incite panic, contaminate property, and even cause injury or death among civilian populations.
"An unconventional threat requires an unconventional response, and the whole world needs to join together and take responsibility for the security of nuclear material."
In the short term, the IAEA would need at least an extra 30–50 million dollars (£21–£36 million) a year to strengthen and expand its programmes to meet the terrorist threat.
The warning came as experts from around the world met at the IAEA in Vienna to discuss nuclear terrorism.
Mr ElBaradei said radiation knew no frontiers, and nations had to recognise that the safety and security of nuclear material was a global concern.
Countries had to demonstrate, not only to their own citizens but to their neighbours and the world, that their security systems were strong.
Reports that some terrorist groups, particularly Osama bin Laden's al Qaida network, had attempted to acquire nuclear material was a "cause of great concern".
According to IAEA figures, there have been 175 cases of trafficking in nuclear material and 201 cases of trafficking in medical and industrial radioactive sources since 1993.
Only 18 of these involved small amounts of highly enriched uranium or plutonium, the material needed to produce a nuclear bomb.
Experts believe the quantities involved to be insufficient to construct an explosive nuclear device. However, Mr ElBaradei added: "Any such materials in illicit commerce and conceivably accessible to terrorist groups is deeply troubling."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments