European Court rules sex is just as important a right for older women
Portuguese judges were guilty of 'prejudices', ECHR rules
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Judges in Portugal were guilty of sexual discrimination in a medical compensation case when they decided that the importance of sex diminished with the age of a woman, Europe's human rights court ruled in a judgment published Tuesday.
Maria Morais, a 50-year-old Portuguese woman with two children, claimed that medical negligence during botched gynecological surgery at a Portuguese hospital in 1995 left her unable to have normal sexual relations. She won her compensation case for physical and mental suffering, but the hospital then won a 2013 appeal that cut the payout by around one-third.
Justifying the cut, judges in Lisbon argued sex was not as important because of her age. The three-judge panel — made up of two men and a woman — were all over 50, according to Morais's lawyer, Vitor Ribeiro. The case triggered a storm of protest in Portugal, where one female lawmaker described the ruling as "Taliban jurisprudence."
The France-based European Court of Human Rights sided with Morais, saying Portuguese judges were guilty of "prejudices" and had violated the right to respect for private and family life. It ordered Portugal to pay Morais 3,250 euros ($3,790) in damages and 2,460 euros for costs and expenses.
The Portuguese court's decision "ignored the physical and psychological importance of sexuality for women's self-fulfillment and other dimensions of women's sexuality," the European court said.
"The (Lisbon court) decision had moreover been based on the general assumption that sexuality was not as important for a 50-year-old woman and mother of two children as for someone of a younger age. In the (European) court's view, those considerations showed the prejudices prevailing in the judiciary in Portugal," it added.
There was no immediate reaction from Portuguese authorities.
The European court noted two other judgments in Portugal, in 2008 and 2014, concerning medical malpractice complaints by two male patients. In those cases, Portugal's Supreme Court found that the fact that the men could no longer have normal sexual relations had affected their self-esteem and brought "tremendous or strong mental shock," regardless of their age or whether they had had children or not.
AP
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments