Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Female researcher hits back after Norwegian colonel claims recruiting more women into the army makes it weaker

Nina Rones disputes Lieutenant Colonel Harald Høiback's comments about women's inferior stamina and shooting ability

Hannah Lawrence
Friday 01 December 2017 19:17 GMT
Comments
Norwegian army soldiers take part in the 'Saber Strike' Nato military exercise in Adazi, in 2016
Norwegian army soldiers take part in the 'Saber Strike' Nato military exercise in Adazi, in 2016 (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A researcher has hit back at a Norwegian commander who claimed women joining Norway’s armed forces had made it weaker.

Nina Rones, of the Norwegian Defence Research Institute, hit back at Lieutenant Colonel Harald Høiback, saying evidence contradicts his claims that men have more stamina.

Speaking to state broadcaster NRK, Lt Col Høiback said: "Armed combat and military actions are an activity very demanding in terms of power and stamina.

“It can imply returning fire for a few hours from a covered position.

“A unit's combat ability is therefore projected to decline even when well-trained women are being recruited at the expense of well-trained men."

But Ms Rones disputed his claims saying there was evidence showing women surpassing men, according to NRK.

She said: "It's not all about physics alone. For example, both organization and communication equipment are important in combat.

“Nor is it the case that men have advantages over women in all physical areas. When talking about ultra stamina there is a lot of research showing that women are getting better than men.”

In August a study found women had greater muscle endurance than men and could “outlast men by a wide margin”, according to its author, Professor Brian Dalton. Mr Dalton also said women had the potential to dominate if an ultra-ultra-marathon was developed.

Ms Rones also said that women are as good, or better, than men when it comes to shooting.

In her rebuttal, Ms Rones claimed the debate about the physical differences between women and men is often led by emotions.

"There is much more to a combat situation than pure physics," she said.

“It's about understanding situations, being able to orient, being able to be part of a team and handling weapons. This makes women as good as men.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in