Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Leak of Gibraltar plan 'was sabotage'

Colin Brown,Elizabeth Nash
Sunday 13 January 2002 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Leaks of an alleged imminent deal to let Spain share sovereignty over Gibraltar were condemned yesterday as an attempt to sabotage talks over the British colony's future.

The disclosure that Britain and Spain were close to agreement on shared sovereignty, subject to a referendum in Gibraltar, provoked outrage among Opposition MPs in Britain and campaigners in Gibraltar who want the colony to remain British.

The Foreign Office insisted no agreement had been made and dismissed claims that the former Cabinet minister Peter Mandelson could be the new Governor of Gibraltar to "see the transition through".

Government sources believe the leaks were intended to scupper talks next month between Spanish and British ministers.

Spain's El Pais newspaper reported on Friday that agreement was close between Britain and Spain over sharing sovereignty indefinitely. Spain has long proposed a period of co-sovereignty of about 50 years as a transition towards full transfer to Spain, during which confidence-building measures would be established to win over Gibraltarians. Britain has always rejected the offer.

Both sides promise to have a deal ready by the summer, and accept that Gibraltarians must approve it.

The shadow foreign secretary Michael Ancram said: "We should make no mistake – sovereignty shared is sovereignty surrendered."

The Labour MP Lindsay Hoyle, chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Gibraltar, said he was disgusted at the reports.

Mr Hoyle, member for Chorley, said: "I am bitterly disappointed, especially as we were given assurances at all levels of government that sovereignty was not on the agenda. I am sure the people of Gibraltar will give a massive majority against joining with Spain. I feel the British government has capitulated to guarantee votes in Europe."

Gibraltar's first minister, Peter Caruana, opposes governance by Spain and boycotted talks in Barcelona in November between Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, and his Spanish counterpart, Josep Pique, to which Mr Caruana was invited.

A Foreign Office spokesman said: "We've always been open about that sovereignty would come up, but this is pretty delicate stuff and it is not helpful is to speculate where things might lead."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in