Killers attacked 'those who drank nation's blood'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The killing of at least seven top Armenian officials, including the Prime Minister, in the Armenian parliament yesterdaymay be connected with corruption and factionalism within the government, specialists on the region said last night.
The killing of at least seven top Armenian officials, including the Prime Minister, in the Armenian parliament yesterdaymay be connected with corruption and factionalism within the government, specialists on the region said last night.
The motives of the assailants were still a mystery, and whether the Prime Minister, VazganSarkissian, was the specific target of the shooting is unclear. But he was a leader of a younger generation of Armenian politicians, and had key responsibility in the economy, deciding state subsidies and the award of government contracts.
"Sarkissian is a very powerful figure domestically. Strong arm tactics get used, and this episode could have been arranged by interests who had lost out in the division of the spoils - or by radicals protesting the corruption in the way business is done," said Anna Matveeva, a specialist on TransCaucasia at the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA) in London. The reported words of one of the gunmen, that they opposed "those who have drunk the blood of the nation", could be interpreted in that sense, she added.
Another, connected, possibility is that the attack stems from a feud within the governing coalition. "Armenian politics is volatile, and political assassinations happen there. Basically, this sort of thing is do-able in Armenia," Ms Mateeva said.
Either way, it appears less plausible that the episode reflects disagreement over the fate of Nagorno-Karabakh, an overwhelmingly Armenian-populated enclave within the legal frontiers of Azerbaijan - the issue that brought down the previous president, Levon Ter-Petrosian.
Like President Robert Kocharian, who appointed him Prime Minister in June, Mr Sarkissian has long been a hardliner on Nagorno-Karabakh, and helped force the resignation of Mr Ter-Petrosian last year.
Fighting first broke out over the enclave in 1988, as separatists sought to reunite it with Armenia, from which Nagorno-Karabakh was severed by Stalin in the 1920s. After six years of hostilities, a ceasefire in 1994 left control in Armenian hands, but did not resolve the final juridical status of the region.
Today a settlement, on which Strobe Talbott, the US deputy Secretary of State, has also been working during his current visit to the region, looks closer than ever before. The rumoured deal would offer some face-saving device for the ailing 76-year-old Azeri president, Gaidar Aliyev, but in practical purposes the enclave would stay with Armenia.
"Everyone in Armenia is a nationalist over Nagorno-Karabakh," Ms Matveeva said. "It's possible these people were ultra-hardliners trying to prevent what they claim would be a sell-out to Azerbaijan, but it's not very likely."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments