Khodorkovsky verdict was ordered from above, claims judge's assistant
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An assistant to a judge who convicted the Russian oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky said yesterday that the judge did not write the verdict, and had read it against his will.
The claim provides a rare insight into Russia's judicial system, where judges are susceptible to political pressure. The judge, Viktor Danilkin, found Khodorkovsky guilty in December of stealing oil from his own oil company and extended his prison term to 2017.
The judge's assistant, Natalya Vasilyeva, said the verdict was imposed upon her boss when it became clear his own ruling would not please senior officials. "Danilkin began to write the verdict. I suspect that what was in that verdict did not suit his higher-ups, and therefore he received another verdict, which he had to read," Ms Vasilyeva told the Dozhd TV channel.
Judge Danilkin said "the assertion by Natalya Vasilyeva was nothing more than slander".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments