Indian restaurant refuses to serve man ‘because he is Indian’
Owner criticises ‘one-sided’ ruling and intends to appeal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An Indian restaurant in Dublin has been ordered to pay €3,000 (£2,745) after officials ruled its owner refused a man service because he was Indian.
Mayank Bhatnagar won a discrimination case heard before the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC).
Mr Bhatnagar told the WRC he had entered Ravi’s Kitchen in July last year, with the intention of having lunch with two colleagues.
He claimed he asked the restaurant’s owner, who was handing out menus, how long the lunch would take because the group had a limited time, according to The Irish Times.
The customer alleged Ravi Shukla, the owner, then asked him if he was Indian.
He replied that he was.
Mr Bhatnagar claimed the proprietor said he did not serve Indians and asked him to leave.
He also claimed that Mr Shukla began shouting about how he his family had suffered before the group left.
His evidence was uncontested and Ravi Shukla, who is from northern India, told The Irish Times he had not received a notification to appear.
During the hearing Marie Flynn, the WRC judge, said she was satisfied that “the respondent was properly on notice of the time, date and location of the adjudication hearing”.
Ms Flynn then ruled, on the basis of Mr Bhatnagar’s uncontested evidence, that the customer had been discriminated against on the basis of race, contrary to the Equal Status Acts.
“I am satisfied that he has established that he was treated less favourably than a person who was not Indian would be treated in a comparable situation.” she said.
“I find therefore that the complainant has established a prima facie case of discriminatory treatment on the race ground.”
Ms Flynn added: “Once the complainant has established a prima facie case, the burden of proof then shifts to the respondent.”
As Mr Shukla was not present at the hearing, the evidence was not challenged.
The restaurant owner said he intended to appeal the ruling and said he was from India himself.
“I refused to serve him because he was unhappy with how long the lunch would take and he wanted a buffet and we didn’t have a buffet,” he said.
“It is a very one-sided ruling. I have lots of Indian customers and I have never refused them service because they are from India.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments