Hurd feels his way to air strikes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.'SOMETIMES, sadly, it takes a tragic and highly visible single act like this to create a political turning point.' With those words, a British official yesterday explained how Douglas Hurd had come to advocate the use of air power in Bosnia after resisting it for two years.
The Foreign Secretary was at Chevening, his official country residence, when news of the shelling of Sarajevo's central market-place broke on Saturday. The attack was at lunchtime; by 3pm, Mr Hurd had formulated a statement, which his aides say did not go via No 10 for approval. It read: 'This brutal shelling of civilians in Sarajevo is the latest and worst single example of the miseries of this war. Those who fired that shell carry a fearful responsibility for murder. The UN commanders on the spot will now report to us on the recent shelling in Sarajevo. The only lasting answer is a negotiated peace. This tragedy shows its urgency.'
Mr Hurd's aides say the statement shows Mr Hurd knew the time to consider air strikes had come. The key words, they say, were, '. . . carry a fearful responsibility for murder'.
Days before, Mr Hurd had indicated that it was 'nonsense' to suggest bombing was the answer. He conceded that if the Serbs resumed the shelling of Sarajevo on a massive scale, it might have to be considered, but said it would probably intensify the fighting. Above all, he insisted there was a pattern of Muslim provocation.
Saturday's attack was different; a consensus quickly emerged that it was the work of Serbs.
There followed a weekend of 'intense diplomatic activity' at Chevening. Mr Hurd spoke twice on the telephone to his US counterpart, Warren Christopher; at least once to his German, Belgian, Spanish and Canadian opposite numbers; and twice to Alain Juppe, the Foreign Minister of France - which, like Britain, must always bear in mind the consequences for its more than 2,000 troops on the ground in Bosnia.
On Sunday afternoon, Mr Juppe called at a press conference for a Nato 'ultimatum' over the siege of Sarajevo. 'The massacre perpetrated yesterday is unbearable and constitutes a turning point in the Bosnian drama,' he added.
A British official yesterday insisted that 'the difference of approach between Paris and London was never nearly so great as you might think, it is merely that the French thinking surfaced earlier'.
When Mr Hurd arrived in Brussels on Sunday evening, he had dinner with the British ambassador prior to the next day's European Foreign Affairs Council. He spoke to Mr Christopher again at midnight. The next morning, on his way to the council, he told reporters: 'The case for air action is very strong, provided we can find a means of doing it which produces more good than harm.' Questioned as to why the case had not been strong over the past two years, an aide to Mr Hurd said: 'I think the effect of these television pictures round the world is greater than you give them credit for.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments