Germany could scrap asylum pledge from constitution, says leading candidate to replace Merkel
Friedrich Merz questions whether constitutional principle enshrined after Second World War ‘can continue in this form’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.One of the leading candidates to succeed Angela Merkel as the head of Germany’s Christian Democrat party has questioned the fundamental right to asylum enshrined in the country’s constitution.
Friedrich Merz said there should be a discussion about whether the constitutional principle “can continue in this form if we seriously want a European immigration and refugee policy”.
The veteran politician said his country’s “individual right to asylum” was unique, before suggesting that a new “legal reservation” could be built into the constitution stating that refugees’ rights would be subject to European rules.
Drawn up after the end of the Second World War, the German constitution states that “persons persecuted on political grounds shall have the right of asylum.”
Mr Merz's comments provoked criticism from the Christian Democrats’ partners in coalition government.
Foreign minister Heiko Maas, of the centre-left Social Democrats, tweeted that “our fundamental right to asylum is a historic achievement. There is nothing to change.”
He argued the German constitution already makes sure there is no conflict with European law.
In response, Mr Merz told German news agency dpa that he was not questioning the basic right to asylum and stands by a policy based on “Christian responsibility and the background of German history.”
A former leader of the Christian Democrats’ parliamentary group, Mr Merz left the Christian Democrats in 2009.
As a corporate lawyer, he went on to take up a number of positions on company boards, becoming a millionaire in the process.
He is now seeking a comeback after a decade away from front-line politics.
He stands for a more right-wing approach to immigration than Ms Merkel, as does another leadership contender - health minister Jens Spahn.
The party is seeking to dent the appeal of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), which has capitalised on discontent over immigration.
But Mr Merz’s remarks on asylum was condemned by his rival Mr Spahn.
“The constitutional right to asylum for political refugees is a great virtue of our constitution, created against the background of two world wars, great suffering and vast displacements,” he wrote on Twitter.
Mr Merz and the Christian Democrats’ general secretary Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer - who appears more in tune with Merkel’s centrist approach - are viewed as the front-runners.
Whoever succeeds in becoming the new party leader on 7 December will be the favourite to become the conservative candidate for chancellor at Germany’s next national election.
Additional reporting by agencies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments