French court rules against Google in books case
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Paris court ruled today that Google Inc. is breaking French law with its policy of digitizing books, handing the US Internet giant a €10,000-($14,300)-a-day fine until it rids its search engine of the literary extracts.
A judge also ordered Google to pay €300,000 ($430,000) in damages and interest to French publisher La Martiniere, which brought the case on behalf of a group of French publishers.
The attorney for Google, Alexandra Neri, said Google plans to appeal the decision.
Google's plans to scan millions of books to make them available online has drawn criticism from publishers and libraries in both the U.S. and Europe.
Even if the case doesn't have much financial impact on Google or force a big change in its book-scanning strategy, it is a reminder that its ambitions are increasingly colliding with fears that the company is getting too powerful.
The head of the French publisher's union said he was "completely satisfied" with the verdict.
"It shows Google that they are not the kings of the world and they can't do whatever they want," said Serge Eyrolles, president of France's Syndicat National de l'Edition. He said Google had scanned 100,000 French books into its database — 80 percent of which were under copyright.
Eyrolles said French publishers would still like to work with Google to digitize their books, "but only if they stop playing around with us and start respecting intellectual property rights."
Philippe Colombet, the head of Google's book scanning project in France, said the company disagrees with the judgment.
"French readers now face the threat of losing access to a significant body of knowledge and falling behind the rest of Internet users," Colombet said in a conference call with reporters. "We believe that displaying a limited number of short extracts from books complies with copyright legislation both in France and the U.S. — and improves access to books," Colombet said.
Colombet declined to answer questions about whether Google would remove the books from its database or pay the fine. "We are going to study the judgment carefully over the coming days," he said.
The judgment will have negligible impact on Internet users outside of France, and French books from publishers Google has agreements with will remain searchable, even in France. Colombet could not say how many French books Google has scanned overall, or how many French publishers it has agreements with.
He said Google has agreements with 30,000 publishers around the world, including 9,000 in Europe.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy has made catching up on France's digital delay one of the national priorities by earmarking €750 million of a €35 billion ($51 billion) spending plan announced earlier this week for digitizing France's libraries, film and music archives and other repositories of the nation's recorded heritage.
Earlier this week a consortium of French technology companies announced a plan to create a book scanning project they said would be better than Google's, but only in three years time.
Google defended its publication of excerpts of copyright-protected material at a trial in September.
A lawyer for the plaintiffs said that using select excerpts without permission "is a bad representation of the works."
U.S. authors and publishers also sued Mountain View, California-based Google. The parties have settled, but are renegotiating details after the U.S. Justice Department concluded that the original deal probably violates antitrust law.
The top U.S. copyright official and the governments in Germany and France also have raised objections about the settlement overstepping its bounds.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments