EU to give anti-terror units power to eavesdrop
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The European Parliament yesterday passed weakened data protection and privacy rules, bowing to pressure from European Union governments eager to boost controls in their fight against terrorism.
The new legislation, which faces final approval by the 15 EU member-states, will give anti-terrorist investigators greater powers to eavesdrop on private data on the internet and other electronic records.
In a key amendment that passed by a vote of 351 to 133, the parliament also gave EU governments the power to force internet and phone companies to retain data and logs of their clients beyond the normal one or two-month billing period.
The EU assembly said governments could ask companies to retain data for an unspecified "limited time" if they determine it necessary "to safeguard national security."
Civil liberty groups and many EU lawmakers fear the restrictions would severely weaken privacy legislation.
"Looking at the results, this amounts to a restriction on privacy and increases the powers of the state," said an Italian independent MEP, Marco Cappato, who authored the bill but failed to stop the amended clause from being inserted.
While the bill binds EU governments to adhere to privacy rights enshrined in the 50-year-old European Convention on Human Rights, privacy advocates fear the new rules are a step in the wrong direction. (AP)
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments