Judge blocks transfer of Dutch dolphins and other sea mammals to China over animal welfare concerns
Animal rights groups say transfer would endanger animals’ welfare and safety
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The transfer of eight dolphins, two walruses and two sea lions to an amusement park in China has been halted by a Dutch judge amid an uproar from animal rights activists.
A judge at the Amsterdam Regional Court issued an order freezing the export of the marine mammals to China’s Hainan Ocean Paradise until the case had been decided.
The order comes after conservation groups Sea Shephard and the local House of Animals took the Dolphinarium theme park in Harderwijk to court over the plans to transfer the animals to the theme park in Hainan, which is still under construction.
House of Animals said it was against the use of animals for entertainment or commercial reasons, and highlighted its campaign against the transfer on its website, saying: “If you decide to export these animals to China, you are not looking after their welfare.”
The stress of relocation and taking them out of a familiar environment to a place with worse conditions would be detrimental to the animals’ welfare, the statement read.
At a hearing on Tuesday, the court said it was issuing an interim order preventing Dolphinarium from using its export licences for the animals until a full hearing, which has been scheduled for 23 November.
Dolphinarium’s park manager Alex Tiebot said this was to be expected. “We had already indicated in court that it would not be a problem for us to wait for the substantive handling of the appeal. It’s already [due] on 23 November,” he told Dutch newspaper De Stentor.
“It doesn’t necessarily mess up the plans,” Mr Tiebot said. “We also have to wait for the import license.”
Animal welfare activists nonetheless welcomed the order. Karen Soeters, the founder of House of Animals, said: “I am very happy with this verdict. On the other hand, I didn’t expect anything else because there is no other way.”
“The park in China sells [tickets on] the animals’ backs. They’re going to do tricks in China, that’s for sure. They’re going to a place in China that we say is even worse,” she told De Stentor.
The animals are even worse off than at the Dolphinarium if they still have to jump through hoops in China, Sea Shepherd said.
A permit for the relocation of the marine mammals expires on 9 January.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments