Denmark in talks with Rwanda on UK-style transfer of asylum seekers
The scheme is the next step in a long-term plan to move the processing of Denmark’s refugees offshore
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Denmark is in talks with Rwanda about setting up a UK-style scheme to transfer asylum seekers to the country.
Human rights campaigners have called the move “deeply disturbing” and warned that it could violate international law.
Setting up the scheme is the next step in a long-term plan to move the processing of Denmark’s refugees offshore. Immigration minister Mattias Tesfaye confirmed the plan, saying: “Our dialogue with the Rwandan government includes a mechanism for the transfer of asylum seekers.”
The deal would aim to “ensure a more dignified approach than the criminal network of human traffickers that characterises migration across the Mediterranean today”, he added.
But Matilda Bryce, policy advisor at the charity Freedom from Torture, said the Danish government’s decision to follow Britain’s example was a “deeply disturbing development”.
“We are particularly concerned that both the UK and Denmark have played down or ignored the risks that torture survivors would face if removed, and neither government has exempted survivors from removal,” she added.
“The United Nations has warned both the UK and Denmark that their plans likely violate international law. By undermining the spirit of cooperation on which our international rules-based system is premised, these ‘cash-for-humans’ schemes threaten the integrity of the entire global asylum system,” Ms Bryce said.
Denmark passed a law last year that allows refugees arriving in their country to be moved to asylum centres in a partner country. The move drew criticism from the European Commission, which questioned the law’s compatibility with Denmark’s international obligations to asylum seekers.
“External processing of asylum cases raises fundamental questions about both the access to asylum procedures and effective access to protection,” Commission spokesperson Adalbert Jahnz said at the time.
Rasmus Grue Christensen, CEO of Danish Institute Against Torture, said that a Danish office in Kigali could work if it focused on “humanitarian and development aid for Rwandans and refugees living in Rwanda”.
However, he added, that the initiative seemed to be an “irresponsible and harmful” step that palmed off Denmark’s responsibility for asylum seekers.
The UK’s first flight to take asylum seekers to Rwanda was due to take off in June but was grounded after a series of legal challenges, and several people due to be on the plane have subsequently been identified as potential trafficking victims.
The scheme has been halted until the legality of the policy is decided at a High Court hearing starting next month, while MPs have also questioned the government’s unevidenced claims that it will deter migrant crossings over the English Channel.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments