Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Russia will care little about the spat between Sergei Lavrov and Boris Johnson - it sees the UK as irrelevant

Analysis: Although, Vladimir Putin's government can relate to Mr Johnson more than predecessor Philip Hammond

Oliver Carroll
Friday 22 December 2017 19:41 GMT
Comments
Boris Johnson and Russian foreign minister talk about frosty UK-Russia relationship

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It was billed in the local press as the visit of one of Russia’s “harshest critics”; a man who, on the eve of talks, has described Russia as modern-day Sparta – “closed, nasty, military and anti-democratic.” There was past history too. An earlier meeting between veteran diplomat Sergei Lavrov and recent-convert-to-the-trade Boris Johnson had already been cancelled.

In the event, it was the Boris and Sergei show – a session filled with jokes, faux barbs, and general bonhomie. “I’m called Boris,” said the British Foreign Secretary. I know, answered his Russian equivalent – “and I trust you so much I will even call you BorIS,” placing the stress on the second syllable, as is correct in Russian.

With huge policy gaps between the countries, it was not long before the two professed statements of disagreement. There were differences on Ukraine, Syria and North Korea, declared Mr Johnson. There was no question that this was a “difficult patch.” Mr Lavrov agreed – and that was even without the fallout from Alexander Litvinenko, the Russian spy assassinated in London in 2006.

Trade relations between Russia and Britain were once excellent – at their height, the best bilateral economic relationship of anywhere in Europe. The new sanctions regime, pushed by the British, has put paid to that. During today’s press conference, Mr Johnson seemed to be clutching at straws for signs of life. Sales of British imports – including the hugely strategic areas of Kettle crisps and Bentley – were going through the roof, he said.

There was not complete cooperation on terrorism, he accepted. But the British minister had a blue pad of paper from the “Fedralnaya sloooozba bezopahznowsty” – “which, I think, is the FSB.” That, Mr Johnson said, was evidence enough of collaboration.

It was classic Boris: bumbling, chaotic, spectacle-driven. But judging by the way the wily Mr Lavrov carried his half of the press conference, Russia is not altogether unhappy having him. Bar a couple of gruff exchanges on alleged interference in the Brexit referendum, the tone of the press conference was, by Moscow standards, tame.

On the one hand, the Russians think they have a man they can relate to. Despite the anti-Russian shots, Mr Johnson embraces much of the Russian political modus vivendi. Alpha male, cynical, showman, risk-taking – he is the exact opposite of his predecessor Philip Hammond, who was not popular in Moscow. With new oligarch-related sanctions coming from the US in the new year, Russia is looking to cultivate every ally it can get.

There is a second, franker point. As poor as relations between the UK and Russia have been since Litvinenko, the British have always been spared the vitriol often directed towards the Americans. And that is because the post-Brexit UK is now largely peripheral to Russian foreign policy goals.

“Moscow doesn’t lose much sleep of what London has to say on matters other than sanctions,” says the former Kremlin advisor and security expert, Vladimir Frolov. “But this has an upside – you are not our arch enemy anymore, just a nuisance.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in