Costly peace-keeping in Somalia
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.(First Edition)
NEW YORK (Reuter) - A UN force for Somalia, due to replace the US-led force that has been protecting famine relief supplies since last December, will cost more than dollars 1.5bn (pounds 1.1bn) during its first year of operations, a UN report said. This would make Unosom, as it is to be known, one of the costliest field operations in UN history. The UN Transitional Authority in Cambodia (Untac), sent a year ago, is estimated to cost more than dollars 1.4bn annually.
In an earlier report that still requires Security Council approval, the UN Secretary-General, Boutros Boutros-Ghali, proposed that Unosom should consist of 20,000 troops plus 8,000 logistics support staff and some 2,800 civilians. He has suggested 1 May as the date for the formal transfer of command from the US-led Unified Task Force (Unitaf) to Unosom. Unitaf had about 37,000 troops from more than 20 countries at its peak but is now being wound down.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments