British man cleared of rape after new DNA evidence sees conviction quashed in Australia
He spent almost two years behind bars before new tests found profiles of two men, not one
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A British man who spent almost two years in jail has been acquitted of raping an American woman at a retrial after new DNA evidence came to light.
Scott Harry Richardson, 27, from Bristol, had been accused of attacking the 23-year-old backpacker as she slept during a house party in Sydney, Australia, on 12 December 2015.
He denied the allegations but was found guilty on 13 December 2016 and was ordered to serve at least two years and three months in prison.
Mr Richardson always maintained that he jumped on top of a duvet covering the woman, believing it to be his friend underneath, and left immediately when he realised his error.
After spending more than 21 months behind bars, his conviction was overturned by appeal judges at New South Wales Supreme Court in July last year.
And on Thursday a jury at Sydney’s Downing Centre court returned verdicts of not guilty on two counts of sexual intercourse without consent following a retrial.
The judges heard that DNA tests using a more advanced method than that used during his trial had found profiles of two men, rather than one.