Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Facebook ‘behaving like a North Korean dictator’ in Australia

Backlash against the ban has forced Facebook to discuss the issue with the Australian government

Mayank Aggarwal
Friday 19 February 2021 10:42 GMT
Comments
File image: Facebook is involved in a bitter battle with the Australian government over paying for the news content by Australian news organisations
File image: Facebook is involved in a bitter battle with the Australian government over paying for the news content by Australian news organisations (AP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Facebook is under fire in Australia after it blocked news content due to their ongoing tiff with the government over a new media code that would result in the social media giant paying local media outlets for news content.

Facebook has said such a move is not acceptable as the proposed code “fundamentally fails to understand” how its services work.

But there is growing anger among officials at the social media giant’s response, with Western Australia’s premier, Mark McGowan, accusing Facebook of "behaving like a North Korean dictator”.

“Facebook is behaving in a bullying and intimidatory manner… They should resolve the matter in an amicable way. What they are doing is wrong,” said Mr McGowan on Thursday while stating that the US government should step in.

On Wednesday, Australia’s Prime Minister, Scott Morrison, said Facebook’s actions to “unfriend Australia, cutting off essential information services on health and emergency services, were as arrogant as they were disappointing.”

Mr Morrison said he is in regular contact with the leaders of other nations on these issues as news emerged that he has spoken to Indian prime minister Narendra Modi about it.

In a post on Facebook, the Australian prime minister cautioned that they “will not be intimidated by BigTech seeking to pressure” them on the new media bargaining code. He had urged Facebook to constructively work with them like Google – which has already made deals with several Australian news organisations.

Elaine Pearson, who is the Australia director of the Human Rights Watch, said: “Facebook is severely restricting the flow of information to Australians. Not just news sites, but also information on government health, emergency services and police pages. This is an alarming and dangerous turn of events.”

William Easton, who is the managing director of Facebook Australia and New Zealand, who announced the move, said that the new code by the Australian government “misunderstands the relationship between our platform and publishers who use it to share news content.”

“It has left us facing a stark choice: attempt to comply with a law that ignores the realities of this relationship, or stop allowing news content on our services in Australia. With a heavy heart, we are choosing the latter,” he had said on Wednesday.

He claimed that over the last three years they have “worked with the Australian government to find a solution that recognises the realities of how our services work”. But the new legislation seeks to penalise Facebook for content it didn’t take or ask for.

“We were prepared to launch Facebook News in Australia and significantly increase our investments with local publishers, however, we were only prepared to do this with the right rules in place. This legislation sets a precedent where the government decides who enters into these news content agreements, and ultimately, how much the party that already receives value from the free service gets paid,” Easton said.

However, the backlash against their move has brought Facebook to the discussion table as its chief Mark Zuckerberg engaged in talks with federal treasurer Josh Frydenberg on Friday and the discussion is expected to continue.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in