Australian school locks boy in cage
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Education authorities in Western Australia yesterday defended the actions of a Perth school where an intellectually disabled boy was locked in a purpose-built cage.
The fenced enclosure at Kenwick School was built on the advice of a behavioural expert who said the 12-year-old boy would benefit from a place to cool off. Its existence was discovered by Sheila Simons, who found out that her grandson, Neil, had been confined there for up to 80 minutes at a time.
Mrs Simons, who is Neil's guardian, won a battle to have the enclosure dismantled, but is demanding the dismissal of the school principal and an apology.
School records show that Neil, who has an autism-related disorder, was locked up nearly every day and sometimes several times a day. He frequently took off his clothes, urinated and defecated inside the enclosure, which was surrounded by a 3.5m-high wire fence. There were no lavatory facilities and he had no access to water. On one occasion, a group of pupils at the school - which caters for children with disabilities - threw stones at him.
The Western Australia Department of Education's assistant director of student services, John Brigg, yesterday defended the use of "withdrawal facilities" or "low stimulation areas" as legitimate and widely accepted.
"We'll be looking into this but ... it is part of the policy that low stimulation areas be used where children with extremely challenging behaviour can be withdrawn for short periods of time," he said."I understand that the outcomes for this particular child were lots of gains made in terms of his ... social behaviour in particular."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments