War on terror is 'leading to civil rights abuses'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Governments may be using the war against terror in Afghanistan as an excuse to lower their own standards on civil liberties, Human Rights Watch said.
The group, which monitors human rights abuses around the world, issued the warning in its 2002 annual report.
In central Europe and central Asia, it said: "In much the same way as the Cold War once distorted the human rights agenda, the prospects for tackling the region's persistent and newly emerging human rights problems seemed suddenly to dim in light of the competing and overriding anti-terrorism imperative."
The report said Russia, Uzbekistan and Egypt were among countries using the war against terror to step up abusive military campaigns within their borders and to crack down against political opponents.
The organisation is particularly pointed about plans to create military tribunals in the United States to try terrorist suspects. Kenneth Roth, its executive director, wrote: "Imagine the US condemning military tribunals set up by a tinpot tyrant to get rid of his political enemies. That kind of criticism can have real sting.
"But now it will ring with hypocrisy – if the Pentagon does not narrow President Bush's order on military commissions with appropriate guidelines."
Terrorists believed that "anything goes in the name of their cause", Mr Roth wrote. "The fight against terror must not buy into that logic. Human rights principles must not be compromised in the name of any cause. For too many countries, the anti-terror mantra has provided a new reason to ignore human rights."
And Mr Roth warned European governments moving to pass anti-terror laws not to lower their own moral standards in the process. "The fight against terror isn't just a matter of security," he said. "It's a matter of values."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments