Nurse deported from Sri Lanka 'over Buddha tattoo' wins compensation
Buddhism is accorded the 'foremost place' in country's constitution but there is no law against tattoos
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A British woman has won nearly £4,000 in compensation from a Sri Lankan court after being wrongly deported for having a Buddha tattoo on her arm.
Naomi Coleman, a mental health nurse from Coventry, made headlines in 2014 when she was detained for four days.
In a ruling the Supreme Court declared she was entitled to compensation and also ordered police involved in her arrest to pay her £246 each, the government's information department said.
Buddhism is accorded the "foremost place" in Sri Lanka's constitution and about 70 per cent of the island's 21 million people are Buddhist. But there is no law banning Buddha tattoos.
Ms Coleman was deported "contrary to the law governing immigration and emigration", the government said. She was not present in court.
One guard had "made several lewd, obscene and disparaging remarks of a sexually-explicit nature" towards her, the BBC reported.
Ms Coleman told the broadcaster: "Finally the court has actually seen it that I didn't do anything wrong."
She would "probably not" return to Sri Lanka, she added.
A lower court had decided to deport Ms Coleman partly because she could have been "vulnerable" if allowed to stay as some Sri Lankans could have been offended by the tattoo, officials said.
In 2013, Sri Lanka, a former British colony, denied entry to a British man because of his Buddha tattoo.
Additional reporting by agencies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments