Sarkozy under scrutiny over troop decision
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.President Nicolas Sarkozy's decision this spring to dispatch hundreds more French soldiers to Afghanistan was extremely unpopular. It was no surprise therefore that within hours of the slaughter in Afghanistan, M. Sarkozy interrupted his French riviera holiday with his wife Carla Bruni to fly to Kabul to support French troops.
It was the deadliest attack on French troops since a 1983 assault in Beirut in which 58 French paratroopers serving in a UN force were killed, and the highest French military death toll in an attack since clashes in Ivory Coast in 2004.
Perhaps out of respect for the dead and injured soldiers, there were no immediate calls for France to pull its 3,000 troops out of Afghanistan. The opposition Socialist party, which called a parliamentary no-confidence vote against M. Sarkozy over his decision to send the extra troops, limited itself to asking foreign affairs committees to meet urgently to ponder "the aims of this war". But the ceasefire is unlikely to last.
"The question now," said Bruno Jeanbart of the polling institute OpinionWay, "is whether public opinion will be reinforced in its feeling of the uselessness of the French presence in Afghanistan or whether the public will rally round their soldiers in difficulty, and become more favourable to it."
When M. Sarkozy was elected last year, he took French foreign policy in a radically more pro-US direction than his predecessor Jacques Chirac. He warned that France could expect casualties when – under pressure from Nato allies – he agreed in April to send 700 combat troops to eastern Afghanistan to serve in a Nato force of more than 40,000 soldiers from 40 nations.
Opinion polls showed that a large majority of French people opposed the move, with many fearing getting bogged down in an unending war whose aims were unclear or unattainable.
The move drew fierce criticism from the socialists and even from within M. Sarkozy's own party. But the President passionately defended his plan, arguing that Afghanistan was the front line in the battle against terrorism. He repeated that line yesterday and said France would not abandon the Nato mission.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments