Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Radiation at Fukushima plant halves in a month

Shinichi Saoshiro
Saturday 22 October 2011 08:47 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The operator of Japan's tsunami-hit Fukushima nuclear power plant has said the amount of radiation being emitted from the complex has halved from a month ago, in the latest sign that efforts to bring the plant under control are progressing.

The Fukushima Daiichi plant, 150 miles north-east of Tokyo, was damaged in March by a devastating earthquake and tsunami in the world's worst nuclear accident since the Chernobyl disaster 25 years ago.

"Radiation from the damaged reactors is 100 million becquerels per hour, which is one eight-millionth of the amount measured soon after the accident," Tokyo Electric Power's vice-president, Zengo Aizawa, said.

Mr Aizawa said that this translates to about 0.2 millisieverts per year of radiation measured at the fringes of the plant, below the 1-millisievert safety limit according to government guidelines.

The amount is half of what Tepco announced at its review a month ago. The company formally brought forward its plan to bring the plant to a state of "cold shutdown" within this year, instead of by January as initially planned.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in