Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Pakistan denies US bid to widen drone-strike zones

Kay Johnson,Associated Press
Saturday 20 November 2010 12:43 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Pakistan has rejected a US request to expand the areas where American missiles can target Taliban and al-Qa'ida operatives, citing domestic opposition to the strikes.

The refusal is a sign of the ongoing tensions between the US and its key ally over the program to find and kill Islamist extremists that have free rein in the lawless areas along the border, where they plan attacks against American and NATO troops in Afghanistan.

The US is increasingly relying on the missile strikes by remote-controlled drones flying over Pakistani territory to combat the militants, launching more than 100 this year and killing hundreds. Most have been in North Waziristan, where the Pakistani military has refused to launch its own ground offensive against the militant mini-state.

This week alone, drone attacks have killed 24 alleged militants, destroying a house and two moving vehicles.

The missile attacks are rarely acknowledged by Washington and Pakistan officially considers them to be a violation of its sovereignty. Critics condemn the program as amounting to assassinations that violate international law.

Pakistan privately tolerates the strikes along its northwestern border as a "necessary evil" but cannot sanction widening them into more-populated areas, said the official with the Pakistani Inter Service Intelligence agency, or ISI. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the press.

He would not specify which new areas the American side hoped to target, but an article in the Washington Post identified one as around Quetta, the capital of the southwestern province of Baluchistan, where Afghan Taliban chief Mullah Mohammad Omar is believed to operate.

The American drones now operate in designated "boxes" in Pakistan's Federally Administrated Tribal Areas located along the lawless, mountainous border with Afghanistan, the ISI official said. He confirmed that US officials had sought both to enlarge the current boxes and establish new ones outside the tribal zone where senior Taliban and al-Qa'ida operatives are suspected to be operating.

The Pakistani side denied the request because the risk of civilian casualties was too great, the official said. The missile strikes already inspire deep outrage among much of the Pakistani populace, he said, and the government cannot afford to inflame more resentment by expanding them into more populated areas.

Pakistan's Foreign Ministry spokesman Abdul Basit condemned any suggestion of expanding the American drones' range.

"We have very clearly conveyed that we will not in any case accept the expansion of the area of these drone attacks," Basit told local AAJ television today. He also repeated the official line that Pakistan wants all the missile attacks to stop.

Basit also rejected the Post's assertion that the Pakistan had agreed to an increased CIA presence in Quetta, where the American spy agency would work with the ISI to hunt down Taliban leaders.

"There is no truth in it," he said. "We do have collaboration with all world's agencies, and we do have that for this war on terror, but as far as operations, they are conducted only by our security forces."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in