Kashmir latest: One downed plane and one airstrike each – can India and Pakistan now call it even?
Analysis: Responsibility for de-escalating tension over Kashmir now rests with India’s Narendra Modi. He may already have made up his mind
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There is a certain symmetry to the way things stand in the highly strung conflict between India and Pakistan – as of Wednesday night, we should add, given just how fast the situation is developing.
On Tuesday morning, India took the unprecedented step of launching airstrikes at what it said were militant targets in Pakistani territory across the Kashmir line of control.
Hours later, the Indian foreign secretary Vijay Gokhale appeared on national TV to talk down the action, explaining that the country meant to target only “the menace of terrorism” and not the state of Pakistan or its citizens – indeed, chastising Pakistan for not taking similar action itself.
On Wednesday morning Pakistan said it had launched its own airstrikes, targeting and then firing away from Indian military assets so as to demonstrate its defensive capability. Chaos only ensued when India scrambled its jets in response, and in the dogfight that followed one Pakistani and at least one Indian jet were shot down.
Then it was the turn of Imran Khan, the Pakistani prime minister, to go on TV and play down his country’s part in the skirmish. His air force had only set out to give India a warning, he said, before things got out of hand. He repeatedly used the phrase “miscalculation” and said such unforeseen events had led to “all wars” in the past.
And so, having shot down one aircraft each (though Pakistan still claims two) and conducted one round of airstrikes each across the line of control, where do the two sides go from here?
In his statement, Mr Khan invited his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi to “sit down and talk”. Clearly it is Pakistan’s view that the violence should end with today’s misadventures.
The Indian government, however, has made plain that it does not see any equivalence between Tuesday’s and Wednesday’s events. In the government’s latest statement, the foreign ministry said Pakistan’s ambassador here in Delhi had been summoned in protest at the “unprovoked act of aggression” by the Pakistani air force.
But while the statement also said India “reserves the right to take firm and decisive action” going forwards, there were two glimmers of hope for observers – the international community included – who want to see a de-escalation of tension.
One was that India said it had handed over a dossier to the Pakistani envoy detailing intelligence regarding both militant camps in Pakistan and “specific details of JeM [Jaish-e-Mohammed] complicity in the Pulwama terror attack” – the deadly car bombing in Kashmir on 14 February that, after all, set this whole situation going.
Mr Khan had already urged India to share any information it has on militant groups so they can “talk about the terrorism that effects us both [sic]”. Publicly seizing on the intelligence shared by India would be one way of reopening paths of cooperation.
Secondly, the Indian foreign ministry confirmed a man shown in videos released by Pakistan is indeed one of its air force pilots, captured after the Indian fighter jet came down in Pakistan-administered Kashmir.
India bemoaned the use of the pilot in the “vulgar display”, saying it contravened the Geneva Conventions, and demanded he come to no harm and be granted “immediate and safe return”.
The pilot certainly “complicates the picture” regarding India’s next steps, one analyst told me. His detention may act as an effective deterrent to any further military action, particularly given the already deafening clamour on Indian social media channels for his safety to be assured.
There are other options India can pursue. As the larger and more robust economy, the country can continue steps it has already been taking since 14 February to diplomatically isolate and – in its view – punish Pakistan for its perceived role in militant attacks in Kashmir.
For the Indian government, hitting back at Pakistan militarily may be seen as a popular move – but with hashtags like “SayNoToWar” and “pakindiaceasefire”, there were plenty of calls from ordinary people on both sides of the border to show restraint.
So all eyes turn to Mr Modi, who did not make a public statement about Pakistan on Wednesday but met with the heads of India’s armed forces after ducking out of a National Youth Parliament festival that was taking place as the details of this morning’s events unfolded. As you read this, he may already have decided what India’s next step will be. Let’s hope he has been paying attention to those hashtags.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments