Japanese rocket falls back to Earth after launch fails
The rocket fired but the second half of the launch failed due to communication problems
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Japan's space agency said on Sunday it had failed to launch a mini rocket carrying a satellite into space due to failure of the communications systems.
The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) said in a statement it had fired the SS-520 rocket at 8.33am JST on Sunday at its Uchinoura Space Center in southern Japan. JAXA said it was unable to receive data from the rocket, which has fallen back to Earth in a spot it had expected.
The rocket, about 10m (35 feet) long and 50cm (20 inches) in diameter, was carrying a 3kg (6.6 lb), 35-centimetre satellite to take images of the Earth and gather other data.
The first stage of the rocket launch was carried out but not the second, after communication problems were discovered, JAXA's spokeswoman told Reuters.
The space agency had postponed the launch of the rocket on 11 January due to strong wind.
Reuters
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments