Japanese court rejects germ war claim
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Japanese high court has rejected appeals by 180 Chinese who were demanding compensation for damage caused by Japan's Second World War germ warfare programme.
Separately, however, the government announced it would take responsibility for cleaning up decaying chemical weapons found in southern China last month that injured three people.
Upholding a lower court verdict, the Tokyo High Court acknowledged damage was caused by Japan's germ warfare in China but ruled that the Japanese government was not responsible for compensating Chinese victims.
The plaintiffs, all Chinese citizens, filed the case in 1997, demanding an apology and 10 million yen (£45,000) each from the Japanese government.
The plaintiffs claim that at least 2,100 Chinese died in outbreaks of cholera, dysentery, anthrax and typhoid from bacteria that were allegedly mass-produced by the Imperial Army's notorious Unit 731 based in the north-eastern Chinese city of Harbin.
In an August 2002 ruling, Tokyo District Court acknowledged Japan used biological weapons before and during the Second World War in violation of international conventions.
But the courts rejected the plaintiffs' demands, saying foreign citizens cannot seek compensation directly from the Japanese government under international law. It also said that Japan had already settled compensation issues under post-war peace treaties.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments