Chinese state media denounces ‘arrogant’ Hong Kong protesters after attack on government HQ
Harsh editorial in Global Times may indicate tougher stance to follow after days of silence
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
![Head shot of Andrew Feinberg](https://static.independent.co.uk/static-assets/support-us/andrew-feinberg.png)
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
A ruling Chinese Communist Party newspaper has taken a hard line against pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong, saying demonstrators who broke into the local legislature showed their “arrogance” and had no regard for the rule of law.
Chinese state media ran footage of police in Hong Kong clearing protesters from the streets, in a break with its silence over days of pro-democracy demonstrations that have challenged Beijing’s authority over the semi-autonomous Chinese territory.
Beijing has largely sought to downplay the demonstrations that have highlighted doubts about the validity of its “one country, two systems” formula for governing the former British colony.
Its coverage of the protests and the publication of a harsh editorial in the official Communist Party newspaper Global Times may indicate it is prepared to take a tougher line against the demonstrators following days of forbearance.
“These violent assailants in their arrogance pay no heed to Hong Kong’s law, no doubt arousing the anger and sadness of all people of the city of Hong Kong,” the editorial said.
Television images showed police moving into roads surrounding the Legislative Council, where protesters smashed through glass and metal barriers to occupy the space for about three hours on Monday night until police moved in shortly after midnight.
Opposition figure Joshua Wong acknowledged that the damage to the legislative offices has drawn criticism from some sectors in the Asian financial hub.
But he said mass participation in marches and rallies over previous weeks showed there was a groundswell of support for the demonstrators’ goals of demanding more accountability from the administration of Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam.
“I understand people in Hong Kong and around the world might not 100 percent agree or disagree on all of the behaviour of protesters ... but all of the requests have been ignored. So, is there any way out?” Mr Wong said.
Ms Lam is “not capable as leader anymore” and should resign, Mr Wong said, echoing the demand of many protesters.
Having been elected by a Beijing-approved committee, Ms Lam is reliant on continuing support from Beijing, which has shown no outward signs of abandoning her so far.
Mr Wong also accused police officers of having “double standards” in enforcing the law, saying pro-Beijing legislators and their staff members have benefited from better treatment than their opposition counterparts throughout the weeks of protest outside the legislature.
On the mainland, Beijing had sought to suppress news of the protests, which roughly coincided with celebrations of the 22nd anniversary of Hong Kong’s handover from British to Chinese rule.
The demonstrations reflect mounting frustration with Ms Lam and her government for not responding to demands from opposition figures that were originally sparked by a government attempt to change extradition laws to allow suspects to be sent to China for trial.
Ms Lam has shelved the bills but not agreed to scrap them altogether as opponents insist she does.
Hundreds of protesters swarmed into Hong Kong’s legislature on Monday night, defacing portraits of politicians and spray-painting pro-democracy slogans in the chamber before vacating it as riot police cleared surrounding streets with tear gas and then moved inside.
The occupation came on the 22nd anniversary of Hong Kong’s return to China.
Protesters whacked away at thick glass windows until they shattered and then pried open steel security gates.
Police initially retreated as the protesters entered, avoiding a confrontation and giving them the run of the building.
Demonstrators stood on politicians’ desks and painted over the territory’s emblem on a wall.
The crowd also wrote slogans calling for a democratic election of Hong Kong’s leader and denouncing the extradition legislation.
Many wore yellow and white helmets, face masks and the black T-shirts that have become their uniform.
The actions prompted organisers of a separate peaceful march against the extradition bill to change the endpoint of their protest from the legislature to a nearby park, after police asked them to call it off or change the route.
Police wanted the march to end earlier in the city’s Wan Chai district, but organisers said that would leave out many people who planned to join the march along the way.
Police estimated that 190,000 people joined the peaceful march, the third major one in as many weeks.
Organisers put the number at 550,000.
The extradition proposal has heightened fears of eroding freedoms in the territory, which Britain returned to China on 1 July 1997.
Debate on the measure has been suspended indefinitely.
Protesters want the bills formally withdrawn and Ms Lam to resign.
Ms Lam, who has come under withering criticism for trying to push the legislation through, called a rare pre-dawn news conference with security officials at police headquarters.
She said that two different protests happened on Monday – one a generally orderly march that reflected Hong Kong’s inclusiveness, the other using vandalism and violence.
“This is something we should seriously condemn,” she said.
Ms Lam disputed protesters’ complaints that officials had not responded to them, saying the government explained that by suspending the bill with no timetable or plan to revisit it, the legislation would die at the end of the current legislative session in July 2020.
For the other demands, she said releasing arrested protesters without an investigation would not uphold the rule of law.
The extradition bill controversy has given fresh momentum to Hong Kong’s pro-democracy opposition movement, awakening broader concerns that China is chipping away at the rights guaranteed to Hong Kong for 50 years under the “one country, two systems” framework.
The two marches in June drew more than a million people, according to organiser estimates.
Surveying damage to the building on Tuesday morning, Legislative Council president Andrew Leung said the previous night’s violence had undermined “the core values of Hong Kong”.
He said police were collecting evidence of criminal wrongdoing.
“I believe many Hong Kong people will share the same feeling with me that we are saddened by what happened last night. For the best interest of Hong Kong, I hope that all of us can find the way forward professionally,” Mr Leung said.
Associated Press
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments