'Evil': How coronavirus plunged US-China relations to a low-point

Chinese authorities and media hit back as the Trump administration tries to shift blame on Beijing

“Evil.”

“Lunacy.”

“Shameless.”

“Sick and twisted.”

China has hit back at US criticism over its handling of the coronavirus pandemic with an outpouring of vitriol as acrid as anything seen in decades.

The bitter recriminations have plunged relations between China and the US to a nadir, with warnings in both countries that the bad blood threatens to draw them into a new kind of Cold War.

A cycle of statements and actions is solidifying long-standing suspicions in Beijing that the US and its allies are bent on stifling China’s rise as an economic, diplomatic and military power.

Hard-liners are calling on Beijing to be more defiant, emboldened by the Trump administration’s efforts to blame China for the mounting death toll in the US.

Moderates are warning that Beijing’s strident responses could backfire, isolating the country when it most needs export markets and diplomatic partners to revive its economy and regain international credibility.

The clash with the US over the pandemic is fanning broader tensions on trade, technology, espionage and other fronts — disputes that could intensify as Donald Trump makes his contest with Beijing a theme of his re-election campaign.

“We could cut off the whole relationship,” Mr Trump said in an interview on Fox Business on Thursday.

While the hostility has so far been mostly confined to words, there are warning signs the relationship could worsen. The trade truce that Mr Trump and his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, reached in January could fall apart, despite recent pledges to keep to its terms.

Other tensions, including those over Taiwan and the South China Sea, are also flaring.

“After the pandemic, the international political landscape will totally change,” Wu Shicun, president of the National Institute for South China Sea Studies, said in a telephone interview.

“The confrontation between China and the United States — in terms of trade, technology, the Taiwan issue, the South China Sea issue — will be a bigger problem.”

The tensions spilled over into the United Nations on Friday when China said that the urgency of the pandemic required the US to promptly pay its delinquent UN assessment, which by some calculations exceeds $2bn (£1.6bn).

China, the second-biggest contributor to the UN budget behind the US, paid its assessment on 1 May. American officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In its first months, the outbreak delivered a political blow to Mr Xi, after officials held back information and discouraged doctors from reporting cases. Mr Trump appeared confident that the US had little to fear, and he praised Mr Xi’s handling of the crisis.

Only weeks ago, Mr Xi and Mr Trump spoke by telephone and proclaimed their unity in the face of the coronavirus. Mr Trump declared his “respect” for Mr Xi, and Mr Xi told him that countries had to “respond in unison” against a global health emergency.

Their brittle unity collapsed as coronavirus deaths exploded in the US. The White House and the Republican Party tried to shift the focus of ire, blaming China for reacting slowly and covering up crucial information.

The backlash, in turn, has reignited the battle over trade, technology, and other issues, with the US on Friday issuing rules that would bar the Chinese telecom giant Huawei from using American machinery and software.

Public sentiment in the US and other countries has also hardened against China, according to recent polls.

“I have a very good relationship, but I just — right now I don’t want to speak to him,” Mr Trump said of Mr Xi on Thursday. A spokesperson for China’s foreign ministry, Zhao Lijian, brushed aside Mr Trump’s threat to sever relations, saying Friday that the two countries should cooperate.

Mike Pompeo, the secretary of state, and other officials have raised the idea that the coronavirus leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which many scientists have said was possible in theory but lacked evidence.

“In Chinese eyes, the Trump administration is trying to delegitimise Communist Party rule and also stigmatise not just China but also China’s top leaders,” Zhu Feng, a professor of international relations at Nanjing University in eastern China, said in a telephone interview.

China’s leaders have struck back through party-run media outlets that said the US and other democracies had ignored warnings and disastrously mismanaged the crisis. China has repeatedly held up its response as a model that other countries should follow, not criticise.

“Such lunacy is a clear by product, first and foremost, of the proverbial anxiety that the US has suffered from since China began its global ascension,” Global Times, a nationalist Chinese newspaper, said on Friday of Mr Trump’s comments.

“It is also a combination of envy and panic on behalf of Washington elites.”

Communist Party-run news outlets have lashed out specifically at Mr Pompeo for arguing that the outbreak might have leaked from a Chinese lab.

“If this evil politician Pompeo is allowed to continue his swaggering bluff, one fears that United States ‘great again’ can only be a joke,” said a commentary broadcast on CCTV, China’s main state television network.

Chinese media have also singled out Matt Pottinger, a deputy national security adviser who delivered a direct appeal to the people of China — in Mandarin — to embrace democratic change.

“Everything Mr Pottinger has done is like a weasel pretending to offer New Year’s greetings to a chicken,” said a response on CCTV to his speech.

Policymakers in Beijing will to some extent discount the loud accusations from the Trump administration as a product of domestic political manoeuvring. But the recent bitter exchanges were also a symptom of a worsening in the relationship that existed even before the coronavirus outbreak.

“There is a major reassessment of US-China interdependence underway,” said Julian Gerwirtz, a scholar at Harvard’s Weatherhead Centre for International Affairs.

“Even if Xi might like to temporarily de-escalate the trade and technology conflicts to reduce pressure on the Chinese economy, there is now powerful momentum behind what we might call a ‘security-first’ future.”

The editor of the Global Times, Hu Xijin, has called for China to expand its nuclear arsenal in response to US actions.

“We are facing an increasingly irrational US, which only believes in strength,” he wrote last week.

Other hawks have warned that China needs to be prepared to deal with clashes over Taiwan and the South China Sea, where US warships have stepped up patrols this year. Some hardliners have gone further, warning of war.

“We have to dig out those traitors who have been bought out by the United States and do its bidding,” Wang Haiyun, a retired major general attached to a pro-party foundation in Beijing, wrote in a policy proposal circulated this month on Chinese nationalist websites.

The bellicose voices in Beijing have been subtly challenged by proponents of a more moderate approach, and the Chinese foreign ministry distanced itself from Mr Hu’s comments on nuclear weapons. Despite the ill will, both governments have pushed ahead with the partial deal to ease trade tensions.

“China is also highly polarised,” said Mr Zhu, the Nanjing University scholar.

“Some people just believe that there’s no way but to just fight back. But I don’t think so,” he said. China, he said, “needs to be very coolheaded”.

For Mr Xi, jousting with the US may help rally domestic support after China’s missteps in the early stages of the outbreak. But he appears to have no appetite for all-out confrontation, especially as he tries to restore the Chinese economy.

Since 2012, Mr Xi has expanded China’s military hold on the South China Sea, promoted industrial programmes that irked American companies and authorised mass detentions of Muslim minorities in China’s far west, all the while wagering that he could keep in check recriminations from Washington.

After a trade war that dominated 2019, Mr Xi had seemed confident that he had reined in tensions, and, according to a White House adviser, remarked late last year that he would rather deal with Mr Trump than Democrats who dwelled on human rights.

Mr Xi has not spoken to Mr Trump since their call in March.

“The rapport we speak of between the top leaders, so they can use good personal relations, has I think totally gone,” Cheng Xiaohe, an associate professor at the School of International Studies at Renmin University in Beijing, said in an interview.

How Mr Xi plays his hand against the US could reverberate for years — for his political fortunes and for China’s standing in the world.

While Mr Trump will take into account the presidential election, Mr Xi too must consider his prospects for a third term from 2022. Mr Xi has no clear heir apparent, and in 2018 he abolished a term limit on the presidency, opening the way to an indefinite time in power as both president and Communist Party leader.

Mr Xi does not want to seem weak in the face of foreign demands nor does he want to risk an extended economic downturn, said Yun Sun, director of the China Program at the Stimson Centre.

“The Chinese philosophy is that when a leader is strong he can afford to be flexible and moderate,” she said. “But when a leader is weakened, that’s the time that you need to worry.”

The New York Times