Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Colonel condemns leaks about army in Afghanistan

Pa
Friday 03 December 2010 12:48 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A former British commander condemned WikiLeaks today for revealing US cables containing concerns about British forces not being "up to the task" in Helmand province in Afghanistan.

Colonel Stuart Tootal, who commanded the 3rd Battalion of the Parachute Regiment in Helmand, told BBC Breakfast: "The people who leak this stuff, they're not helping anyone. They are certainly not helping the poor British or American infantrymen and they are certainly not helping Afghan people.

"I don't think any of this is in the public interest."

He said the US held British forces "in the highest regard" and said the army had ensured "strong security" in Afghanistan for US troops.

But Col Tootal admitted the UK had suffered from a lack of resources in Afghanistan.

Referring to comments in the cables claiming the UK had "made a mess of things" in Helmand, he said: "These are the views of some individuals and they are some time ago.

"They refer to a period of time when there were not the right resources.

"Some of the individual criticisms I think are very unfair. We have now got the resources in place.

"I don't think (the army) made a mess of things but we got some of our approach wrong in not having enough resources.

"A lot of this comment is historic and some of it is unfair."

The father of a soldier killed by a blast in Afghanistan said he agreed with the comments made in the leaked cables.

Ian Sadler said British troops were not properly equipped to fight and that he welcomed the WikiLeaks release.

His son, Trooper Jack Sadler, 21, of the Honourable Artillery Company, died after the Land Rover he was travelling in hit a mine north of Sangin in Helmand Province on December 4 2007.

Mr Sadler, from Exmouth, Devon, said: "I agree with what they said. We weren't up to doing the job.

"The soldiers were, but they didn't have the support of the government, and they still don't have the full support. They're still using the wrong vehicles.

"If you employ a carpenter but you buy his tools in a toy shop, you shouldn't expect him to do a good job."

He said too much money was spent on civil servants' salaries and pensions rather than on vital equipment.

"The British Army with American equipment would be second to none," he added.

Mr Sadler said he did not mind that the comments had been leaked in such a way as they had come from "people on the ground".

He added: "They thought that it was a secure link, so they said what they thought. They didn't think anybody was going to pick up on the comments. We usually only get the politically-correct version of the truth."

Colonel Richard Kemp, former British commander in Afghanistan, told Sky News that no-one could criticise the "fighting spirit of British soldiers" but added: "What is being criticised here, and I would agree with some of the criticism, is the under-resourcing."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in