China rescinds life sentence of man who killed loan shark for taunting his mother after public outcry

Yu Huan found guilty over death of creditor who subjected parent to degrading sexual treatment but punishment revised after case sparks national uproar

Philip Wen
Friday 23 June 2017 14:16 BST
Comments
The government has promised to redress miscarriages of justice after several high profile cases, including wrongful executions of people later proven to be not guilty
The government has promised to redress miscarriages of justice after several high profile cases, including wrongful executions of people later proven to be not guilty (Damir Sagolj/Reuters)

A Chinese court has rescinded a life sentence handed to man who killed a loan shark who had sexually taunted his mother, in a case that has made national headlines and ignited heated online debate.

The government has promised to redress miscarriages of justice after several high profile cases, including wrongful executions of people later proven to be not guilty.

But the case of Yu Huan, who on Friday had his life sentence cut to five years following a retrial, has also prompted debate about whether widespread public anger over the initial verdict had a bearing on the much more lenient final outcome.

Yu, from Liaocheng in Shandong province, was sentenced to life in jail in February after he used a knife to attack four of his mother's creditors who taunted and exposed themselves to his mother while demanding a 1 million yuan ($146,000) debt be repaid in April last year, according to state media. One of the creditors died.

In demanding repayment, one of the creditors exposed his “nether regions” and “gyrated” in front of Yu's mother while flicking cigarette butts at her and forcing her to smell Yu's shoes, the Shandong High Court said in its judgement.

Widely referred in media as the “Dishonoured Mother case”, the initial sentence evoked widespread sympathy for Yu, whose defence of his mother resonated in a country where filial piety is considered a core value.

The court said that while Yu acted in part to protect his mother, a five-year sentence was appropriate given his actions went beyond reasonable self-defence, and that he later resisted arrest when police arrived.

The verdict was a top-trending topic on the Weibo social media platform. While many users were pleased the court took into account he was protecting his mother, some felt a five-year jail term was too lenient.

“Public opinion has to an extent influenced the judiciary,” one Weibo user said.

Acknowledging the interest in the case, the court released a statement explaining how it reached its verdict.

“The media coverage of the Yu Huan case has ignited widespread attention,” it said.

“Today, the Shandong High Court handed down its verdict in accordance with the law, and while the retrial process has ended, we will continue to seriously reflect on and sum up the case.”

Reuters

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in