Tiananmen Square: Chinese defence minister justifies 1989 massacre
Protests were ‘political turmoil’ and crackdown was ‘correct policy’, says Wei Fenghe
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.China’s defence minister has defended 1989’s bloody crackdown on protesters in Tiananmen Square, which he said was justified in the name of stability.
Referring to the demonstrations as political “turbulence”, Wei Fenghe said it had been the “correct policy” for troops with assault rifles and tanks to fire at the unarmed, student-led protesters.
Estimates vary on how many people died on 4 June 1989, but it is thought between 1,500 and 4,000 demonstrators were killed and 10,000 wounded.
“Throughout the 30 years, China under the Communist Party has undergone many changes,” General Wei said in a hardline speech about trade and security at a regional forum in Singapore.
“Do you think the government was wrong with the handling of 4 June? There was a conclusion to that incident. The government was decisive in stopping the turbulence.”
He said the Tiananmen protests were “political turmoil that the central government needed to quell, which was the correct policy”, and claimed that China’s stability and development justified the actions.
It is rare for Chinese authorities to even acknowledge the demonstrations, which saw students and workers occupy Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in a massive pro-democracy protest.
The protest was joined by 1 million people at its peak, but on the night of 3 June 1989, tanks and troops moved into the square and opened fire on unarmed protesters in and around the central Beijing square.
Two days after the massacre a single protester, known as “Tank Man” or the “unknown protester”, stood in front of a convoy of tanks leaving Tiananmen Square.
As the lead tank manoeuvred to pass him, he repeatedly shifted his position in order to obstruct the tank’s attempted path around him.
Film of the incident was smuggled out of the country and broadcast all over the world.
Afterwards, the authorities blamed the protests on counter-revolutionaries seeking to overthrow the Communist Party and claimed no one had been shot dead in the square itself.
The country has never released an official death toll.
Reporting on the events of 4 June 1989 and mentioning them on social media are heavily censored in China.
Every year, police detain dozens of activists, journalists and critics in the run-up to the anniversary.
Chinese Human Rights Defenders (CHRD), a US-based group supporting activism in China, said 13 activists had been detained or “forced into disappearance” ahead of the anniversary to “silence any expression or thwart any action” this year.
CHRD said Shen Linagqing, a dissident writer, was denied food, water and the use of a toilet for 24 hours.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments