Coronavirus: China cases might have been more than four times official figure, says study
Researchers claim true number is much higher if wider case definition of Covid-19 is applied
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The number of coronavirus cases in mainland China may have been more than four times the official figure, a new study has said.
Academics at Hong Kong University’s school of public health have estimated that there could have been 232,000 infections in China by 20 February, rather than the 55,508 cases Chinese authorities reported by that date.
The researchers, whose findings are published in The Lancet, claim the true number of cases would have been much higher if China had applied a wider case definition of Covid-19 from the outset of the virus.
They analysed seven different versions of case definition in China between 15 January and 3 March.
According to the study, the case definition was “initially narrow”, later broadening to include milder cases and cases without links to the city of Wuhan.
The academics estimate that the proportion of detected infections rose by 7.1 times between the first and second definition, by 2.8 times between the second and fourth and by 4.2 times between the fourth and fifth.
The study’s prediction of the number of cases is based on applying the fifth definition from the start of the coronavirus outbreak.
“If the fifth version of the case definition had been applied throughout the outbreak with sufficient testing capacity, we estimated that by 20 February 2020, there would have been 232,000 ... confirmed cases in China as opposed to the 55,508 confirmed cases reported,” the study said.
The findings come as China faces growing scrutiny over its coronavirus figures and its handling of the crisis.
Last week, the city of Wuhan revised its death toll up by 50 per cent to 3,869 fatalities.
President Trump and other US politicians have been particularly vocal in their criticism of Beijing.
Earlier this week, Cui Tiankai, the Chinese ambassador to the US, responded by criticising US politicians for being “preoccupied in their efforts for stigmatisation, for groundless accusations”.
As of Thursday, China has recorded 82,798 Covid-19 infections and 4,633 deaths from the virus.
Globally, more than 2.62 million people have tested positive for coronavirus and 183,761 people have died from it.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments